Audit Finds Former UT Law Staffer Embezzled $1.6 Million
University of Texas Law School Dean Ward Farnsworth has apologized for lax financial controls at the school that allowed a former facilities director to funnel funds to himself, and vowed to implement stricter oversight procedures.
September 16, 2019 at 12:21 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
The University of Texas School of Law is working to boost its financial oversight after an internal audit found that an ex-employee embezzled nearly $1.6 million.
Former facilities director Jason Shoumaker resigned in 2017 after questions arose about questionable spending at the law school. He was arrested in May of 2018 and indicted later that year on charges of of theft, money laundering and abusing his official capacity. An audit conducted by the university and an outside law firm found that the law school ignored warning signs, failing to flag unusually large payments to vendors or tracking whether paid services were actually delivered.
Law dean Ward Farnsworth apologized to the law school community in a Sept. 13 email, saying the school is in the process or has already implemented the 17 recommendations issued in the auditor's report, as well as some additional steps.
"One important conclusion of the audit is that I myself did not establish adequate controls over this employee," Farnsworth wrote. "For this, I have apologized to the university, and I apologize to you. The well-being of this wonderful institution has always been my highest concern as your dean."
University of Texas Provost Maurie McInnis did not mince words in an Aug. 30 letter to Farnsworth, writing that the dean missed opportunities to stop Shoumaker's alleged fraud.
"You did not respond effectively to signs of trouble," the letter reads. "Instead, when you were alerted of concerns regarding your employee's procurement and accounting practice irregularities, you did not ensure his compliance with our policies regarding essential documentation and appropriate processes. The lack of oversight allowed the employee to continue a pattern of misappropriation of funds resulting in significant loss to the university."
It's not the first time the Austin law school has faced public scrutiny over its finances and spending. Former law dean Larry Sager resigned that post in 2011 amid a scandal over stipends and forgivable loans intended to recruit and retain faculty members. The law school's foundation issued $5.5 million in such loans, with Sager obtaining one for $500,000.
Nor is it the first time that law school employees have been accused of defrauding their campuses. Jennifer Ihns, a former clinic staffer at the University of Notre Dame Law School, was sentenced to two years in prison in 2018 for embezzling nearly $200,000 from the school. A former controller at New England Law Boston—Douglas Leman—pleaded guilty in 2011 to stealing more than $173,000 from the school.
According to the University of Texas audit, the law school's chief business officer spurred the investigation in 2017 by raising concerns about significant moving expenses Shoumaker authorized in 2014. That payment was $700,000 more than the estimated cost of the services required. The audit concluded that Shoumaker made personal purchases with law school funds.
"Also, there were financial losses because of an elaborate pattern of payments to the director from outside vendors for work purportedly done at UT," the report reads. "Additionally, these outside vendors received a considerable markup for the payments from UT, as directed by the director."
The audit includes 17 recommendations for the law school to improve its financial oversight. Among them:
–Ensure employees only retain the services of approved vendors.
–Expand controls over the use of law school procurement cards.
–Verify that projects are completed to satisfaction before submitting payment documentation.
According to the letter from McInnis, the law school is also funding an ongoing audit of its internal business operations for the next 12 months.
"While these management failures are serious and concerning, I believe that with your commitment and cooperation with internal audit, we can work collaboratively to ensure we achieve excellence," she wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250