What Law Firms Need to Know When Hiring a Well-Being Director
These professionals come from a variety of backgrounds with a wide breadth of knowledge and experience and with credentials in vastly different things.
September 23, 2019 at 12:33 PM
6 minute read
|
As the attention to mental health within the legal industry is increasing, more law firms are hiring professionals to head up their well-being efforts. With few road maps or even a clear definition of what a well-being professional is, it can be difficult to determine the right fit for a particular firm's needs.
These professionals come from a variety of backgrounds with a wide breadth of knowledge and experience and with credentials in vastly different areas. They are licensed therapists, social workers, personal coaches, nurses, mindfulness experts and even personal fitness trainers.
They bring their own unique talents to the table, and while all of these talents have a place within the larger framework of well-being, law firms should look for four key elements when bringing on a professional to design and head a well-being program.
|Systemic understanding.
A well-being professional who works within any organization is working within a system, and that system creates the culture, structure and institutional history of the organization. Those elements, in turn, have significant impact on the experiences of those who work there.
Law firms, especially, have markedly different cultures depending on the firm. A well-being professional's ability to identify and properly assess how the larger system bolsters or inhibits individual well-being increases the ability to create programming that improves not only the wellness of individual attorneys, but also productivity, success and well-being of the firm as a whole.
To make a medical parallel, a doctor can treat the symptoms of a child's asthma attack, and the child can experience momentary relief. But when the doctor also inquires about the child's environment, such as exposure to second-hand smoke, she can assist in providing resources such as smoking cessation programs that positively affect the child long term as well as the health of the entire family system.
To determine whether an applicant for a well-being director position at your firm meets the "systemic understanding" criteria, consider this interview question: Describe how your work addresses individual well-being within the context of the organization's larger system? How does your work promote or, if necessary, challenge the culture that impacts employees?
|Continuum of care.
There is a parable about people standing beside a river bank when they notice someone drowning in the rushing current. They pull the person to safety only to realize that more and more people are coming down the river, struggling to stay afloat. They rescue and revive as many as they can, but some are swept away too quickly. Eventually, one rescuer realizes that they can't keep pulling drowning people out of the water. The real solution is to go upstream, find out where people keep falling into the river and repair the broken bridge that is causing the accidents.
Understanding continuum of care means being able to provide programming and services that range from proactive and preventative (making sure the bridge is sturdy so people don't fall in the river), to restorative treatment and care (pulling people out of the river when they slip in). A professional skilled in addiction recovery or physical fitness plays a vital—and even life-saving—role within a well-being framework. Such a targeted area of expertise, however, might not best serve a director's role that requires holistic programming along the continuum of care.
Interview questions: What assessments, tools and programs do you use that engage with employees along the continuum of their well-being? What can be offered to those who are already high-achieving and resilient and how is it different from what is offered to those struggling with burnout and mental health challenges?
|Knowledge of industry standards.
More and more industry associations are creating standards of well-being as a guide to their member organizations. The American Bar Association's Well-Being Pledge and Toolkit was born out of the 2017 ABA National Task Force on Lawyer Well-Being. Some of these guidelines are just that—suggested guidelines. Others, like the ABA Pledge and Toolkit, encourage law firms to become signatories to the pledge and commit to specific standards. A well-being professional within the legal industry should have a deep understanding of the seven pillars of the ABA Well-Being Pledge, best practices for attorneys and legal professionals, and strategies for not only meeting but exceeding those standards.
Interview questions: Describe your understanding of ABA Well-being Pledge. How would you use that as a framework for your efforts to increase resilience and well-being within the firm? Do other industry association standards inform your practice? How do they apply within the legal community?
|Use of assessment and evaluation.
You can't repair what you don't know is broken. Many times we know something is wrong, but the exact "what" can be harder to determine. When the water starts dripping from the kitchen ceiling, we know we have a problem. Determining what precisely is causing that leak and getting it fixed requires a call to the plumber.
A well-being professional should have a the ability to evaluate an organization's challenges and strengths through skilled observation, interviewing and formal diagnostic assessment. Furthermore, they should have the ability to set targeted outcomes and collect data on those outcomes for evaluation.
Interview questions: What are your standards for evaluation? What are your methods for assessing both the needs of an organization and the outcomes of a well-being program? Are you licensed to use or have access to use formal assessment tools?
As with any professional position within a law firm, there is no one-size-fits-all. Having a strong foundation in the four key areas above ensures that the professional you hire has firm footing to meet your law firm's unique needs.
Read more – Minds Over Matters: An Examination of Mental Health in the Legal Profession
|Renee Branson is the founder of RB Consulting, which works with lawyers, law firms, legal marketers, business professionals and nonprofit groups to create more humanized and healthier workplaces, as well as to strengthen highly achieving individuals and teams. Find her at reneebranson.blog.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250