Why Firms Keep Flocking to 'Perfect' Minneapolis
Low costs, a strong talent pool and Fortune 500 companies have firms crowding into the City of Lakes.
September 23, 2019 at 06:48 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Low costs, a strong talent pool and an abundance of upper middle-market corporations are the factors that are luring a steady stream of law firms to open outposts in Minneapolis.
In 2019 alone, a parade of large out-of-town firms—including Greenberg Traurig, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, and Spencer Fane—have announced they are opening offices in the City of Lakes.
"It's a really underappreciated market when it comes to the economic dynamism of the geography," said Steve Ryan, the president and managing partner of Minneapolis firm Briggs and Morgan. "It's an incredible place for businesses to thrive. There's incredible access to talent."
Last month Ryan's firm announced plans to merge with Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister, creating a 600-lawyer firm and giving Taft, the larger of the pair, a Minneapolis presence for the first time.
Ryan said he expected more mergers to be announced in Minneapolis by the end of the year. But law firm management consultant Thomas Clay, a principal at Altman Weil, said combinations may slow down—precisely because the city has been attracting so much interest.
"It's getting tougher to find tasty morsels," Clay said.
Both Clay and Brian McMahon, the managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's Minneapolis office, agreed that finding merger partners in a hot market isn't a challenge that's unique to Minnesota.
But McMahon said he has found that, as more firms enter the Minneapolis market, "local lawyers' and firms' attitudes are evolving, and more firms and lawyers are receptive to attaching to, or at least investigating, a national platform."
He added that he has seen no evidence that national law firms' interest in Minneapolis has waned—he said he knows of at least four that want to be there as soon as possible.
The strength of a legal market is dependent on the regional economy, and there are 17 Fortune 500 companies that call Minnesota home, including UnitedHealth Group, the nation's largest private insurer, which is headquartered in a western suburb of Minneapolis.
Greenberg Traurig already had existing relationships with many of those companies when it opened its Minneapolis office in February, said Michael Fisco, the managing shareholder of that office. He said the firm had been eyeing the market for a while before it found local lawyers with the the right fit—three partners from DLA Piper.
Even though Minneapolis is home to major corporations such as Target, the costs of doing business there are substantially cheaper.
"For a large city with substantial client potential, the overhead is much lower by comparison," said Heather Kliebenstein, the chair of Merchant & Gould's litigation practice group. In terms of price per square foot, the rent on Merchant's office in Minneapolis is cheaper than its New York and Washington, D.C., offices, Kliebenstein said.
That also means lower billing rates. In its 2018 Partner Compensation Survey, Major Lindsey found that, among the partners it surveyed, the lowest average billing rate was found in Minneapolis at $550. The highest average was in New York at $994.
This leads to a disparity in compensation—the average compensation of a Minneapolis partner is $593,000 while a New York partner pulls down $1.4 million, according to the survey.
But quality of life was routinely mentioned as being an important draw for lawyers based in Minneapolis. McMahon said he works with young associates who tell him they're moving to Minneapolis from larger markets on the coasts because "they see it as the perfect combination of a robust legal industry" paired with a good, affordable lifestyle.
Fisco said that's what beckons lawyers from Minneapolis who start their careers on the coasts to return back home: "It's a good market to raise your family and to have a vibrant, sophisticated practice."
Clay noted that his own son is paying a "ridiculous" $1,800 a month for a 400-square-foot apartment in New York City" "Clients, talent, desirability, affordability—Minneapolis, I think, is benefiting from all of that."
|Read More
Market Focus Minneapolis: What the Past, the Future and the 'Minnesota Way' Mean for Law Firms
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute read'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250