Grand Openings: Where U.S. Law Firms Are Setting Up Abroad
U.S. firms have added thousands of foreign lawyers in the past decade. Where are they focused, and why?
September 24, 2019 at 05:30 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
In the decade since the Great Recession, the largest U.S. law firms have mirrored their global clients, spreading their footprint in an effort to bring in more business. In doing so, they've opened offices from Sheffield to Shanghai and everywhere in between, adding thousands of international attorneys, with some firms focused on operating in key financial centers, and others looking to open in as many locales as possible.
A review of 10 years of data for the 2019 Am Law 200 firms shows that the 110 firms on the list with international lawyers have added 6,626 lawyers and 198 offices outside the United States, when accounting for mergers, openings, closings, hirings and departures. (Firms without 2009 data available were not included.) That amounts to an 8% increase in offices around the world and 35% growth in global lawyers employed by the biggest U.S. firms.
One-third of all those new lawyers can be found in London, far and away the biggest driver of U.S. firms' international growth. That leap in head count matches the growth of the next seven busiest cities combined: Paris, Hong Kong, Sydney, Mexico City, Singapore, Milan and Melbourne. (View an infographic breakdown of the data at the bottom of this page.)
"There's a lot of things going for American firms over there, not least of which is there's so much commonality of interest between the United States and the U.K.," Joseph Altonji, founding principal of law firm consultancy Law Vision, says. "Pretty much every transaction on the planet is done in U.S. or U.K. law, so if you're a significant player, you want a presence in both markets."
The Am Law 200 now have 81 offices in London, 15 more than they did in 2009. The only city with a larger influx of U.S. offices is Seoul, which has added 18 offices among the Am Law 200 since a free trade agreement with the United States opened the market in 2012. Those offices hold just 68 lawyers, though, a stark contrast to London's droves of attorneys. Indigenous Korean firms hold sway over clients, and full liberalization of legal practice has yet to arrive, making it a difficult market to penetrate, Tony Williams of Jomati Consultants says.
"Firms took the view they couldn't not join in, but the fact that everybody joins in doesn't necessarily mean it's the best business decision," Williams says.
Shanghai (12 new offices), Beijing (11), Dubai (10) and Hong Kong (nine) join London and Seoul as the fastest-growing cities. The 32 new offices in China raise its total to 140, split equally among Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai. But Hong Kong is home to more than two-thirds of the 2,553 lawyers spread across the cities, and saw more than three-quarters of the growth, adding 446 lawyers in the past decade.
"There is a sense that you have to be there and you have to be there in some credible way," Altonji says of China, "but what that means can vary dramatically."
An expanding China presence has been a major thread in U.S. firms' recent international growth, but as the global chairman of a U.S. law firm made clear in this magazine four years ago, success there is in the eye of the beholder. His firm's strategy, he said, was simple: "to lose less money than any other U.S. firm in China."
Seventeen cities have more than doubled their cohort of Am Law 200 lawyers in the past decade, paced by Perth, Australia, which had just one lawyer in 2009 but now boasts 149. Sydney, now home to 316 lawyers among the Am Law 200, Melbourne (204) and Brisbane (103, all new) have also more than doubled as U.S. interest in Australia has grown.
Mexico City has seen a 175% increase in U.S. firms' presence, swelling to 486 lawyers. And in South America, Bogota, Lima and Rio de Janeiro have each seen over 250% growth.
No firm has been more active in opening international offices than immigration-focused Fragomen, which has opened 20 new offices to grow its collection to 27. Squire Patton Boggs (12 new offices), Baker McKenzie (11), Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (10) and K&L Gates (nine) have also rapidly expanded their footprints.
John Quinn, co-founder of Quinn Emanuel, describes his firm's global growth strategy as "opportunistic," guided more by lawyers than locations.
"Our new offices are driven by the desire to recruit particular talent," he says, rather than to be in a particular city.
Law firms have largely begun to take "a far more businesslike approach" to international growth, Williams says.
With profitability climbing ever higher in cities across the United States, the calculus has changed for those thinking of opening up a new office abroad.
"It has raised the bar for their investments around the world," Williams says. "Why would we go to a market where we can't get the same profitability we can in the U.S.?"
For some firms, the quest to obtain work in the most profitable cities has made such locations as Paris, Hong Kong, Frankfurt, Brussels and London popular destinations for office openings (38 among them). Meanwhile, other firms are busy chasing down clients that need firms that operate across the globe, making more far-flung locations attractive. It's the latter group that will keep expansion going in the coming years, Altonji says.
"If you're really trying to just stay with the financial centers of the world, I suspect most firms playing to that strategy have accomplished most of the office openings they need to," he says. "But if your goal is to be a global service provider to major corporations across a broad spectrum of legal work, then you don't stop at the international financial centers."
For his part, Quinn has no trouble identifying the guiding principle that explains the international growth of the past decade and where it's taken place—and where it might go from here.
"It's economics," he says. "Where are the clients? Where is the wealth?"
Email: [email protected]. Ben Hancock contributed to this report.
Infographic credit: Roberto Jimenez
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250