In EU Tax Fight, Starbucks Wins but Fiat Loses
The EU's General Court ruled that Starbucks should not have been ordered to pay back taxes to the Netherlands. But it ruled that the commission was correct to order Fiat Chrysler to pay back taxes.
September 24, 2019 at 11:11 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Margrethe Vestager, the EU's antitrust czar, has suffered a partial setback in her drive to stop EU countries from granting sweetheart tax deals to multinational companies.
The EU's General Court ruled today that the commission was wrong to order Starbucks to pay €30 million ($33 million) in unpaid taxes to the Netherlands. In a separate judgment, it ruled that the commission was correct in ordering Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe to repay a similar amount to the Netherlands.
Responding to the rulings, Vestager, who has just been nominated for a second term as commissioner for competition, said in a statement: "All companies, big and small, should pay their fair share of tax. If member states give certain multinational companies tax advantages not available to their rivals, this harms fair competition in the EU.
"Today's judgments," she continued, "give important guidance on the application of EU state aid rules in the area of taxation. At the same time, each case has its specificities and involves complex legal questions."
She said the commission would study the judgments carefully before deciding on possible next steps.
The commission has the right to appeal the court's ruling in the EU's Court of Justice, the bloc's highest court.
Vestager said the commission would "continue to look at aggressive tax planning measures under EU state aid rules to assess if they result in illegal state aid".
The court was ruling on two decisions taken by the commission in 2015: one against Starbucks and its tax arrangements in the Netherlands, and one for Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe in Luxembourg.
Both commission decisions were based on the argument that the companies benefited from special arrangements, granted by the tax authorities in the countries in which they were operating, which meant they paid lower taxes than their competitors.
In the case of Starbucks, the EU court found the commission had failed to prove that the company benefited from the tax arrangement.
For Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe, the court found that a ruling by the Luxembourg tax authorities approving arrangements did benefit the company compared to its competitors.
The companies and the governments that granted the tax deals have the right to appeal the court's decisions.
Vestager's drive to clamp down on EU governments granting sweetheart deals to multinational companies was a major part of her five years as commissioner for competition. She also ordered Apple to repay $14 billion in unpaid taxes to Ireland. A judgment in that case is expected in the coming months.
Related reads:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
Kline & Specter and Bosworth Resolve Post-Settlement Fighting Ahead of Courtroom Showdown
6 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250