'Do Us a Favor': Trump Wanted Barr, Giuliani to Help Ukraine Investigate Biden
The president made the remarks in a call that sparked a well-publicized whistleblower complaint.
September 25, 2019 at 11:41 AM
4 minute read
President Donald Trump urged the Ukrainian president to get in touch with Attorney General William Barr about launching an investigation tied to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, according to a transcript of the call released Wednesday.
"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it," Trump said during the call, before asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into a topic related to former special counsel Robert Mueller III's investigation.
Trump made the remark after Zelensky suggested that Ukraine might be prepared to buy missiles from the U.S.
"I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it," the president added, according to the transcript of the July phone call released by the White House.
Zelensky said that his country "will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue," in reference to the cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike, which had determined that Russia had hacked the Democratic National Committee's servers.
"I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out," Trump said. "I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything."
In a statement released Wednesday, a spokeswoman for the attorney general said Barr has not spoken with the Trump about having Ukraine investigate Biden's son, and that Barr has not been asked to contact Ukraine.
"The Attorney General has not communicated with Ukraine—on this or any other subject," said DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec in a statement. "Nor has the Attorney General discussed this matter, or anything relating to Ukraine, with Rudy Giuliani."
The Justice Department also released an Office of Legal Counsel memo Wednesday, stating that the whistleblower complaint about the call was not "urgent" because it involved the president, and not a member of the intelligence community.
In an unclassified version of the memo released Wednesday, the office stated that the whistleblower heard of Trump's conversation with Zelensky secondhand. Assistant Attorney General Steven Engel, however, argued that Trump was not a member of the intelligence committee, and the complaint therefore did not have to be shared with Congress.
Engel said the whistleblower provided "a hearsay report that the President, who is not a member of the intelligence community, abused his authority or acted unlawfully in connection with foreign diplomacy." And it said Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson found the complaint to be "urgent" because the director of national intelligence "has operational responsibility to prevent election interference."
"But even if so, it does not follow that the alleged misconduct by the President concerns 'the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority' of the DNI because the allegations do not arise in connection with any such intelligence activity at all," the memo states. "The complaint therefore does not state an 'urgent concern.'"
Engel wrote that OLC doesn't believe "the subjects of 'urgent concern' reports to the ICIG are broader than other matters that fall within the investigative and reporting authority of the ICIG."
And he revealed that the inspector general found "some indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate," but that Atkinson determined the claims still "appeared credible."
Rather, the OLC memo argues that the matter should have been referred to DOJ.
The memo was released at the same time as the White House released its transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky.
Read the telephone memorandum:
Read the opinion:
Read more:
Democrats, After Months of Mulling Options, Have Apparently Found Legal Case for Trump's Impeachment
2 Key Lawyers in Whistleblower Saga Have Lauded Oversight. Now, They Are Divided
US House Weighs Lawsuit Forcing Disclosure of Mystery Whistleblower Complaint
Barry Berke Makes House Debut With Lewandowski as Democrats Push Impeachment
Greg Craig Found Not Guilty of Deceiving DOJ About Ukraine Work
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeveral Big Law Firms Saw Year-Over-Year Lobbying Revenue Growth in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250