Ex-Willkie Co-Chair Gordon Caplan Asks Judge to Spare Him Prison
A former top lawyer at Willkie asked a federal judge to sentence him to no time behind bars, while the government is arguing he is a con-man who should get an eight-month sentence.
September 26, 2019 at 06:25 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Gordon Caplan, the former co-chairman of Willkie Farr & Gallagher who pleaded guilty to working with a crooked college admissions consultant to rig his daughter's ACT score, asked a Boston federal judge Thursday for a sentence of no prison time
Prosecutors have called for an eight-month sentence for Caplan, saying not only did he pay a $75,000 bribe so that his daughter's test answers would be corrected by associates of corrupt consultant William "Rick" Singer, but he hired a lawyer to challenge the ACT's decision to cancel her score. Eight months is the bottom of the guidelines range agreed to in Caplan's guilty plea.
But Caplan argued his admission of guilt doesn't tell the full story. He said he was caught up "in a toxic mix of tense family issues at home, aggressive recruiting and college 'advisory' pitches" that "warped" his judgment and "allowed himself to fall prey to his own ego." Public humiliation and the other consequences Caplan said he and his family suffered were enough, he argued.
"He screwed up. He committed a crime. He has owned it. He was a highly skilled lawyer who should have known better," Caplan's defense team at Ropes & Gray and Smith Villazor wrote. "Yet, the Gordon Caplan who was on the phone with Rick Singer was a father looking at an easier path forward; his role as a corporate lawyer was peripheral to this conduct."
The government reiterated Thursday its request for an eight-month sentence, plus a $40,000 fine and a year of supervised release. Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Rosen said Caplan wasn't like some other parents, who were interested in legitimate college admissions advice but were convinced to break the law. He only came to Singer for a criminal scheme, Rosen wrote.
The prosecution's new sentencing memo also included previously unreleased material from a recorded call between Singer and Caplan where he is quoted as saying, "I never want to do anything that couldn't be on the front page of the Wall Street Journal but … we did what we did."
"Like many con-men, Caplan committed his crime from behind a façade of feigned integrity," the government wrote. "Caplan boasted on his law firm's website and in interviews with news organizations about his pro bono work for immigrant children even as he secretly conspired to bribe an ACT administrator and pay a corrupt test-taker to cheat on his own child's college entrance exams.
"Jail is the only appropriate sentence for a leader of the bar who displays such callous disregard for honesty and the rule of law," prosecutors added.
Some defendants have already been sentenced. Stephen Semprevivo, for whom prosecutors had sought 15 months in prison, was sentenced to four months behind bars Thursday, as had Devin Sloane, another defendant. Felicity Huffman was sentenced to two weeks behind bars—and Caplan said that if he was sentenced to any time at all, he should merit a similar sentence, saying he "basically engaged in the same conduct" as Huffman did.
Sentencing is set for Oct. 3.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250