Ex-Willkie Co-Chair Gordon Caplan Asks Judge to Spare Him Prison
A former top lawyer at Willkie asked a federal judge to sentence him to no time behind bars, while the government is arguing he is a con-man who should get an eight-month sentence.
September 26, 2019 at 06:25 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Gordon Caplan, the former co-chairman of Willkie Farr & Gallagher who pleaded guilty to working with a crooked college admissions consultant to rig his daughter's ACT score, asked a Boston federal judge Thursday for a sentence of no prison time
Prosecutors have called for an eight-month sentence for Caplan, saying not only did he pay a $75,000 bribe so that his daughter's test answers would be corrected by associates of corrupt consultant William "Rick" Singer, but he hired a lawyer to challenge the ACT's decision to cancel her score. Eight months is the bottom of the guidelines range agreed to in Caplan's guilty plea.
But Caplan argued his admission of guilt doesn't tell the full story. He said he was caught up "in a toxic mix of tense family issues at home, aggressive recruiting and college 'advisory' pitches" that "warped" his judgment and "allowed himself to fall prey to his own ego." Public humiliation and the other consequences Caplan said he and his family suffered were enough, he argued.
"He screwed up. He committed a crime. He has owned it. He was a highly skilled lawyer who should have known better," Caplan's defense team at Ropes & Gray and Smith Villazor wrote. "Yet, the Gordon Caplan who was on the phone with Rick Singer was a father looking at an easier path forward; his role as a corporate lawyer was peripheral to this conduct."
The government reiterated Thursday its request for an eight-month sentence, plus a $40,000 fine and a year of supervised release. Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Rosen said Caplan wasn't like some other parents, who were interested in legitimate college admissions advice but were convinced to break the law. He only came to Singer for a criminal scheme, Rosen wrote.
The prosecution's new sentencing memo also included previously unreleased material from a recorded call between Singer and Caplan where he is quoted as saying, "I never want to do anything that couldn't be on the front page of the Wall Street Journal but … we did what we did."
"Like many con-men, Caplan committed his crime from behind a façade of feigned integrity," the government wrote. "Caplan boasted on his law firm's website and in interviews with news organizations about his pro bono work for immigrant children even as he secretly conspired to bribe an ACT administrator and pay a corrupt test-taker to cheat on his own child's college entrance exams.
"Jail is the only appropriate sentence for a leader of the bar who displays such callous disregard for honesty and the rule of law," prosecutors added.
Some defendants have already been sentenced. Stephen Semprevivo, for whom prosecutors had sought 15 months in prison, was sentenced to four months behind bars Thursday, as had Devin Sloane, another defendant. Felicity Huffman was sentenced to two weeks behind bars—and Caplan said that if he was sentenced to any time at all, he should merit a similar sentence, saying he "basically engaged in the same conduct" as Huffman did.
Sentencing is set for Oct. 3.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
University of Chicago Accused of Evicting Student for Attending Gaza-Israel Protest
3 minute readState Appellate Court Rejects Reasoning for Attorney's Removal From Conservatorship
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250