Opening Statements in Trial of Murdered Law Prof Present Stark Differences
The former in-laws of the victim played prominently during Thursday's opening statements in the trial over the killing of Florida State law professor Dan Markel, even they have not been charged in the 2014 death.
September 26, 2019 at 01:50 PM
5 minute read
State prosecutors and defense attorneys offered wildly divergent theories of who killed Florida State University professor Dan Markel in 2014 during opening statements Thursday in the murder trial of two people accused in his death.
Georgia Cappleman, deputy assistant state attorney, told the jury of 10 women and two men assembled in a Tallahassee, Florida, courtroom that defendant Katherine Magbanua helped to broker a murder-for-hire and that co-defendant Sigfredo Garcia pulled the trigger, killing Markel in the driveway of his Tallahassee home while Garcia's friend Luis Rivera helped.
Behind the plot, the prosecutor asserted, are the mother and brother of Markel's ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, who was embroiled in a legal battle over where the couple's two-children would live. (No members of the Adelson family have been charged in connection with Markel's death.)
"Wendi Adelson had a problem, and that problem was Dan Markel," Cappleman said during her opening statement. "The solution to that problem was Magbanua, Rivera and Garcia."
Prosecutors said they believe that Wendi Adelson's brother, Charlie Adelson, and their mother, Donna Adelson, ordered the hit in order to help Wendi Adelson relocate to South Florida from Tallahassee with the couple's two sons to be closer to the Adelson family, which runs a dental clinic outside of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Members of the Adelson family, as well Magbanua and Garcia, have steadfastly maintained that they had nothing to do with Markel's death.
Saam Zangeneh, who is representing Garcia, sought to discredit Rivera—the state's star witness—telling the jury that Garcia is a career criminal who would say anything to save himself.
Rivera is a leader of a Latin Kings gang in Miami and was already serving a 12-year federal prison sentence for racketeering when he and Garcia were arrested in 2016 for the Markel murder. Rivera pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and cooperated with prosecutors, implicating Magbanua and Garcia. He received a 7-year sentence to run concurrently with his earlier sentence.
"The only person who can put Sigfredo at the scene," Zangeneh told the jury, "is the guy who got the deal of a lifetime."
Zangeneh said that Rivera offered inconsistent stories about the murder that over time fit perfectly with the prosecution's theory of the case. The defense attorney offered an alternative theory of the killing: That Rivera was supplying drugs to Wendi Adelson's brother, Charlie Adelson, who hired him directly to kill Markel.
Rivera carried out the killing with the help of a Latin Kings associate in Tallahassee, Zangeneh told the jury. Moreover, Garcia disliked Charlie Adelson because he was dating Magbanua and would not have helped him. (Magbanua is Garcia's on-again-off again girlfriend and the mother of his two children.)
Magbanua's attorney, Tara Kawass, focused her opening statement on what she called holes in the prosecution's case against Magbanua and the state's selective approach to the evidence it will present at trial. The state has used Magbanua as a "pawn" in order to get to its ultimate target—Charlie Adelson—Kawass said. Her client's arrest and the three years since that she has spent in jail are an act of "prosecutorial desperation" in the absence of clear evidence tying her to the murder, Kawass told the jury.
Kawass offered an alternative explanation for the influx of cash that showed up in Magbanua's bank account in the months following the murder. The attorney said her client was working at clubs and doing promotional events for liquor brands, which were jobs that paid well, and in cash. Moreover, if Magbanua had received thousands of dollars from the Adelsons to set up a murder—as the prosecution alleges—it makes little sense that she would create an obvious paper trail by depositing it at the bank, Kawass continued. She also cast doubt on Rivera's credibility.
Judge James Hankinson of the Second Circuit Court of Florida is presiding over the trial. Jury selection in the case began Monday, and prosecutors expect to take four weeks to present their case.
Following the opening statements, the jury heard testimony from Markel's neighbor who called 911 after hearing shots fired and who found Markel slumped over in her car and covered in blood. In addition to a recording of that call, the jury heard testimony from the first Tallahassee police offer to arrive on the scene, as well as testimony from the man Markel was on the phone with at the time he was shot.
Markel and Wendi Adelson, also a lawyer, divorced in 2013 after seven years of marriage. The couple had joint custody of their two children but continued to wrangle in court over issues pertaining to the kids. At the time of his death, Markel had asked the court to prohibit Donna Adelson from having unsupervised visitation with the children on the grounds that she was making disparaging comments about him in their presence.
Following Markel's death, Wendi Adelson moved to South Florida with the children and changed their last name from Markel to Adelson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250