California's Solicitor General Would Make SCOTUS Debut in DACA Case
Michael Mongan, who clerked for Justice David Souter and for D.C. Circuit Judge Merrick Garland, would share time with Gibson Dunn's Theodore Olson in challenging the Trump administration's move to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
September 30, 2019 at 05:31 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
California's top state appellate lawyer is poised to make his U.S. Supreme Court debut in just a few weeks in support of shielding hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants from deportation under the Obama-era program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
Solicitor General Michael Mongan is requesting to split 40 minutes with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Theodore Olson, who would argue for certain individual DACA recipients. Mongan would represent the interests of 20 states—including California, New York, Connecticut, Delaware and Pennsylvania—that are arguing against the Trump administration's efforts to rescind the program.
Mongan would make his rookie appearance before the high court in one of the new term's most visible cases, one that crystalizes the ongoing fight between the White House and Democrats over immigration and citizenship. But he is no stranger to the nation's biggest legal stages.
Named California's solicitor general just a little over two months ago, Mongan argued for the state in defense of DACA before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in May 2018. Six months later, the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court's injunction blocking the Trump administration's attempted rollback of DACA, which temporarily exempts certain undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation.
The Supreme Court is expected soon to outline its argument plans for the DACA case. It's not uncommon in consolidated cases to let a variety of lawyers argue in support of various positions.
Kyle Hawkins, the Texas state solicitor, has asked the Supreme Court for 10 minutes of argument time to advance the interests of Republican-led states who are supporting the Trump administration's move to end DACA. Noel Francisco, the Justice Department's solicitor general, is expected to argue for the U.S. government.
Mongan, while serving as a deputy solicitor general, was lead counsel for the state and some of its largest cities on an amicus curiae brief challenging the federal government's ultimately unsuccessful attempt to place a citizenship question on the 2020 U.S. Census.
A 2006 graduate of Stanford Law School, Mongan clerked for Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and, later, U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter. He served as deputy counsel to Vice President Joe Biden before joining Munger, Tolles & Olson in 2010.
Mongan went to work for California Solicitor General Edward DuMont in 2014 and served as a deputy and supervising deputy until taking the reins of the 10-attorney office this summer after DuMont resigned. DuMont, a former Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partner, has not said what his plans are.
In the DACA case, Mongan is attorney of record for California, which filed its merits brief on Sept. 27 in the Supreme Court. The team working with Mongan includes Michael Newman, senior assistant attorney general, and deputy solicitors general Samuel Siegel and Joshua Patashnik. The solicitors general for Maine, Maryland and Minnesota were on the states' brief with the California team.
The Gibson Dunn team includes Theodore Boutrous Jr., global co-chair of the firm's litigation group, and Stuart Delery, a Washington-based partner who formerly was a leading Obama-era Justice Department lawyer.
"Executive power is important, and we respect it," Olson, a former George W. Bush administration U.S. solicitor general, told The New York Times last week. "But it has to be done the right way. It has to be done in an orderly fashion so that citizens can understand what is being done and people whose lives have depended on a governmental policy aren't swept away arbitrarily and capriciously. And that's what's happened here."
Read more:
Former Souter Clerk Michael Mongan Is Named California Solicitor General
Trump Tweets and Litigation Risks: Key Takeaways From 9th Circuit's DACA Hearing
When Rookies Take Bat at the US Supreme Court
Mike Scarcella contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250