Judiciary Reprimands Kansas Federal Judge for Sexually Harassing Court Employees
The public reprimand is the most severe sanction available to the judicial council.
September 30, 2019 at 06:30 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Kansas was publicly reprimanded Monday for misconduct that included sexually harassing court employees and other "inappropriate behavior."
The Judicial Council of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, chaired by Circuit Chief Judge Timothy Tymkovich, held that U.S. District Judge Carlos Murguia sexually harassed employees, engaged in an extramarital relationship with a felon who was then on probation, and was "habitually" tardy for court engagements.
A public reprimand is the most severe sanction available to the council. The order said evidence and facts associated with the misconduct allegations "are insufficient" to recommend that Murguia be impeached.
An order signed by Tymkovich said the council reached its conclusions after an extensive investigation that included interviews with 23 people and a hearing at which Murguia testified under oath.
Murguia admitted the misconduct allegations, apologized for his behavior and promised he would not engage in any inappropriate conduct in the future. He also offered to take any recommended voluntary corrective actions.
The committee "found no evidence that his misconduct continued" after he was served with the initial complaint.
But the committee determined that Murguia "was less than candid" when initially confronted with the allegations and "did not fully disclose the extent of his conduct."
"He tended to admit to allegations only when confronted with supporting documentary evidence," the order said. "His apologies appeared more tied to his regret that his actions were brought to light than an awareness of, and regret for, the harm he caused to the individuals and to the integrity of his office."
Murguia was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1999. His sister, Mary Murguia, is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit who was also appointed by Clinton.
The council determined that Carlos Murguia "gave preferential treatment and unwanted attention" to female judicial employees, and engaged in "sexually suggestive comments, inappropriate text messages, and excessive non-work-related contacts, much of which occurred after work hours and often late at night."
The federal judicial Code of Conduct bars judges from engaging "in any form of harassment of court personnel."
Women subjected to harassment told council investigators they were reluctant to tell Murguia to stop "because of the power he held as a federal judge."
The order also said Murguia's "years-long sexual relationship" with the felon, who is now back in prison for probation violations, placed the judge "in such a compromised position that he made himself susceptible to extortion."
The relationship violated federal judicial ethics canons because "reasonable minds" could conclude the judge's "honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired," the order said.
The council also chastised Murguia's habitual tardiness for court proceedings, often requiring attorneys, parties and juries to wait and sometimes making lawyers late for other judicial proceedings. A repeated cause of Murguia's tardiness was his "regularly scheduled lunchtime basketball games" on days when he had scheduled hearings or trials. According to the order, Murguia was counseled repeatedly about his tardiness "fairly early in his federal judicial career," but his conduct "persisted never-the-less."
Read the order:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250