Law School Clinical Faculty Ranks Are Slow to Diversify, Study Finds
A study by the Clinical Legal Education Association finds that women are over-represented among law school clinical faculty, while black and Latino clinicians have made few gains over the past three decades.
October 02, 2019 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
|
The percentage of women clinical faculty at law schools nearly doubled over the past 30 years, but progress has been much slower among minority clinicians, a new report has found.
Minorities now compose 20% of all full-time law school clinicians—up from 9% in 1981. By contrast, the percentage of women teaching clinics full time increased from 33% to 62% during that same time period, according to a new study of clinician faculty demographics conducted by a committee of the Clinical Legal Education Association (CLEA).
Those findings suggest that law schools should take steps to reach out to and recruit minority clinicians, while at the same time ensuring that women are not disproportionately clustered in clinical positions—which lack the same status and pay as doctrinal positions, authors of the study assert.
"I think we were surprised by the lack of more significant progress over time—although anecdotally most of us, just looking around the institutions where we work, should not have been surprised given that we've all been working within law schools and clinics," said Caitlin Barry, a clinical professor at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law and one of the article's seven authors. "I would not say that, on the whole, the findings are positive."
CLEA established its Committee for Faculty Equity and Inclusion, which conducted the study, to "draw attention to the crisis of diversity among clinical faculties, and to urge law schools to take proactive steps to remedy this longstanding failure."
The new study builds upon the findings of a 2000 law review article by Rutgers law professor Jon Dubin that tracked the demographics of clinical faculty since the 1980s. According to the new article, titled "The Diversity Imperative Revisited: Racial and Gender Inclusion in Clinical Law Faculty" that appears in the most recent edition of the Clinical Law Review, progress on the racial diversity front has been "limited" over the past 20 years.
The percentage of black clinical professors has never exceeded 7%, a high that it first reached in 1999. Similarly, Latino and Latina professors make up just 5% of clinicians, which is the same threshold they represented in 1981. The one minority group that has seen a sizable increase in its representation among clinical faculty is Asian Americans, up from 2% in 1999 to 6% in 2017, the study found. In all, nearly 8 out of 10 full-time clinic professors today are white.
That's a problem for numerous reasons, the authors say. Research shows that women and minority students perform better in classes taught by diverse faculty, and that minority professors provide key mentorship to students. And since clinical faculty often dictate the communities their programs serve, maintaining diversity among their ranks also helps ensure that clinical programs are assisting a broad array of clients.
"An inclusive faculty is vital to the teaching and service mission of clinical education, plays a key role in student recruitment, retention, academic achievement and professional development, and enhances the viewpoints that will influence clinic dockets, scholarship, and pedagogy," the article reads.
But there is reason to be cautious about funneling more women and minorities into clinical positions—particularly since recent diversity gains have coincided with a decline in the number of tenure-track positions and an increasing reliance on faculty with short-term contracts and adjuncts. Thus, today's more diverse clinical faculty may not enjoy the same level of job status and protections as their predecessors, the article warns.
"Our wariness is that if progress is only made around positions with lower status, lower compensation, and fewer benefits, is that really progress in the bigger picture?" Barry said. "The concern we have around the data regarding women was just that that progress has not been made across the legal academy. If it's only in the clinics, then we're concerned that women are being more highly concentrated in positions that offer less protections."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250