New High-Tech Way to Choose a Law School Debuts
The program from AccessLex Institute uses an in-depth questionnaire to help aspiring law students identify the law schools that align most closely with their career goals, their financial priorities, and their preferred locale and lifestyle.
October 02, 2019 at 05:59 AM
4 minute read
Big Law or public interest? Six-figures in loan debt or very little borrowing? Sunny weather or close to home?
Those are a few of the preferences would-be law students weigh while completing XPloreJD, a new online program from AccessLex Institute that aims to help users determine what matters most to them, then identify the best law schools based on those priorities. The free tool, which came online Wednesday, is designed to educate users about law school and legal careers and provide insight that goes beyond a school's U.S. News & World Report ranking.
"This is not meant to compete with other resources or tools, but really to supplement and, hopefully, be a first step for someone who is exploring law school but doesn't know a lot of about it," said Tiffane Cochran, managing director of research at AccessLex. "Maybe they know about U.S. News & World Report and know what the T14 schools are, but aren't really sure which schools are best suited for them."
XPloreJD is based on an in-depth questionnaire that asks users to input their preferences in six different areas: location, cost, enrollment, diversity, curriculum, employment and bar pass outcomes. Users identify then which of those factors are most important in selecting a law school. The initial data input process takes about 15 minutes, though its designers urge people to spend more time contemplating and logging their preferences.
The program runs those preferences through a proprietary algorithm and provides a list of schools that most closely meet those criteria. Along with the list, the tool provides more data on those schools, links to their websites, and allows users to compare schools side-by-side. It also enables users to adjust their preferences and narrow their focus. They can save their results for future use. (AccessLex Institute is a nonprofit organization aimed at increasing access to legal education through research and programming.)
"There are plenty of services that rank law schools or project likelihood of admission to a particular law school, and while such information may have value, we believe students should have a free and easy way to consider and prioritize all the factors that will impact their law school decision in a holistic and well-informed way," said AccessLex president Chris Chapman.
XPloreJD's algorithm uses law school data pulled from the American Bar Association, U.S. News & World Report, the U.S. Department of Education, and even the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (It uses NOAA data to narrow down schools based on the type of climate users prefer.)
The goal is not to simply spit out a list of schools users should consider, Cochran said. Rather, its designers hope to help users think through what is important to them, and better understand the application process as well as how law school works.
"They should think about where their academic credentials will place them in a school's incoming class, but they should also consider other aspects of fit, such as location, size and diversity, as well as graduation outcomes, such as bar passage, clerkship opportunities, and job placement rates," she said. "Navigating all of this information can be difficult for some pre-law students. XploreJD is designed to change that."
For example, the questionnaire doesn't just ask users to input what type of job they hope to have upon graduation, but it also provides information on what a public interest job is. It weighs schools based on where users aspire to work, based on ABA data showing the states in which a school's alumni tend to work.
AccessLex has been bolstering its programming for aspiring law students in recent months. XploreJD comes on the heels of the release of MAX Pre-Law—an online program that helps potential law students think through every aspect of that choice to determine whether or not law school is right for them. It also helps with choosing a law school, applying for it, and understanding the finances of getting a law degree.
XploreJD took about two years to come to fruition, and AccessLex purposefully released it at the start of the admissions cycle in hopes that it will help people who want to begin their legal studies next fall.
"It's the only tool for pre-law students that gives you a learning experience—that sort of provides you with a virtual pre-law adviser in front of your face," Cochran said. "It gives you some information that I don't think is easily accessible from other sources."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 2Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 3How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 4Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 5Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250