45 General Counsel Sign Letter Supporting Review of MDL Procedures
The letter asks the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning initial census, interlocutory appellate review and third-party funding litigation.
October 08, 2019 at 04:58 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Seeking certain changes to multidistrict litigation, 45 general counsel and chief legal officers signed a letter asking the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning initial census, interlocutory appellate review and third-party funding litigation.
"The Committee's review of the procedures used in multi-district litigation proceedings (MDLs) comes at a point of crisis," the letter says.
The group indicated that an initial census rule will stop meritless claims from entering the MDL space. The GCs said in large MDLs, up to 40% of claims are meritless. Under the proposed rule, plaintiffs would need to present evidence of their alleged harm early on.
"An initial census rule could solve the problem by requiring evidence of exposure to the alleged harm and evidence of injury to be produced within 60 days," the letter says.
Alex Dahl, general counsel of Lawyers for Civil Justice, said in an interview Tuesday that in the course of normal litigation, frivolous claims are often dismissed early in the action.
"However, in MDLs, they often stay on the docket for years at a time without ever being vetted," Dahl said. "The initial census would bring clarity and certainty to MDL cases involving how to vet claims early in the case."
Appellate review is rare in multidistrict litigation, the letter says. This is because the cases often settle. However, it is easier for plaintiffs to appeal a judge's decision than it is for defense counsel. The general counsel group says interlocutory appellate review would lead to more consistent results and provide better guidance for future parties and courts.
"For defendants, having some certainty about the legal basis of the case before you go through all of those trials is a very helpful data point that can help those defendants assess the case and the risk and the value of the resolution," Dahl said.
The letter also says there should be a rule requiring the disclosure of third-party litigation funding.
"It's important for parties in litigation to know who is actually in the courtroom," Dahl said. "It can help inform critical decisions including decisions about settlement value."
The letter was signed by the top lawyers at:
- Altec Industries Inc.
- Altria Group Inc.
- American Property Casualty Insurance Association
- Amgen Inc.
- Argo Group
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
- The AZEK Company LLC
- BASF Corp.
- Bayer US LLC
- Becton Dickinson and Co.
- Builders Insurance Group
- Celgene Corp.
- Comcast Corp.
- Cook Medical Holdings LLC
- CSAA Insurance Group; Cummins Inc.
- Eli Lilly and Co.
- Endo International plc
- Exxon Mobil Corp.
- GlaxoSmithKline LLC
- H5
- Hyundai Motor America
- Johnson & Johnson
- Liberty Mutual Insurance
- Medtronic
- Microsoft Corporation
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
- O'Reilly Auto Parts
- Pfizer
- The Procter & Gamble Co.
- The RiverStone Group
- Sanofi US
- The Sherwin-Williams Co.
- Smith & Nephew
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
- Stryker
- SunTrust Banks Inc.
- Tennessee Farmers Insurance Cos.
- Travelers
- Verizon Communications
- Walgreen Co.
- Westfield
- W.L. Gore & Associates Inc.
- Zimmer Biomet
- Zurich North America
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Orders Rudy Giuliani to Court Amid Allegations He's Hiding Assets Under Receivership
'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250