Freshfields Partner Avoids Disbarment in Disciplinary Hearing
The lawyer who stood accused of sexual misconduct, has been fined.
October 10, 2019 at 07:10 AM
4 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer partner Ryan Beckwith has been fined but not banned from the profession, following a nine-day-long hearing into allegations of sexual misconduct.
He has been fined £35,000 ($43,532) and ordered to pay costs of £200,000 ($24,8757).
Beckwith resigned from Freshfields on Oct. 10, the tribunal heard. He had been placed on indefinite leave from the Magic Circle firm in December last year.
It had been alleged that the Freshfields restructuring partner engaged in sexual activity with one of his junior associates without her consent. However, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) today agreed with the defense that Beckwith's behavior fell short of requiring him to be banned from practicing as a solicitor.
The SDT found that Ryan Beckwith did engage in sexual activity and knew or ought to have known that the complainant was intoxicated to the extent her judgement was impaired.
It found that he breached Solicitors Regulation Authority Principles 2 (integrity) and 6 (public interest), and that he knew or ought to have known his conduct was inappropriate.
Throughout the hearing, Beckwith had argued that the encounter with the complainant Person A was always consensual, and that his only failing was a personal, rather than a professional one.
Prosecuting its case, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) had been of the view that his actions fell well below the standard expected of a member of the profession, and that in doing so, he breached two key SRA principles: to act with integrity, and in a manner that maintains the public trust in the profession.
The allegations followed two incidents that occurred in quick succession in 2016: one following a work-organized trip to Le Manoir in Oxfordshire; and the other – the key night in question – following after-work drinks at The Harrow pub near the firm's headquarters.
The complainant, known as Person A, first accused Beckwith of kissing her "on the lips" in the first incident, then, in the second, of taking advantage of her sexually when she was "significantly impaired" and not able to consent.
Williamson and Beckwith argued that the complainant had made false allegations against him, and that it was she who initiated the physical contact, stressing that his conduct was only inappropriate from a "marriage perspective", not from a professional one.
Beckwith's counsel Alisdair Williamson QC argued in mitigation earlier this morning that Beckwith should be spared from being banned from the profession as he had been a "shining example" and argued that his behavior may have been inappropriate, but was "not an abuse of authority".
He asked the decision panel to be "merciful" in its judgment, arguing that the lawyer's "prospects are bleak".
Freshfields senior partner Edward Braham said in a statement: "We note the ruling of the SDT tribunal earlier today. Ryan Beckwith has been on indefinite leave from the firm for some time and has now resigned as a partner with immediate effect.
"The firm takes all complaints extremely seriously. We want a culture that is welcoming and allows our people to flourish, and we work hard to achieve that. We are running a firm-wide program to ensure our values and behaviors are consistently experienced across the firm, and I am confident that we will continue to achieve change where it is needed."
Beckwith's solicitor Brett Wilson partner Nick Brett issued a statement on behalf of Beckwith, stating: "Mr. Beckwith is disappointed with the finding of the tribunal. He is presently taking advice on the outcome and it would not be appropriate for him to comment further at this stage."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute readFree Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
3 minute readFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute readIndian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250