Florida Law Professor's Killer Gets Life in Prison
A Tallahassee jury rejected the death penalty for Sigfredo Garcia four days after they found him guilty of murdering up-and-coming law professor Dan Markel.
October 15, 2019 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Sigfredo Garcia. (Photo : Broward Sheriff's Office)
Sigfredo Garcia will spend the remainder of his life in prison for the 2014 murder of Florida State University law professor Dan Markel.
A Tallahassee jury deliberated for 40 minutes before recommending a life sentence over the death penalty—the only other option available after they found him guilty of first-degree murder Oct. 11. Judge James Hankinson of the Second Circuit Court of Florida followed the jury's recommendation and officially handed down a life sentence for the first-degree murder conviction, as well as a 30-year sentence for conspiracy to commit murder, to be served consecutively with the life sentence. Garcia will not be eligible for parole.
Garcia appeared relieved when the jury delivered its recommendation. Deputy assistant state attorney Georgia Cappleman told the jury in her closing arguments during sentencing that the death penalty is appropriate because Garcia had ample time to reconsider his role in Markel's murder, which was in the works for well over a month before it happened.
"There is no evidence that this defendant's role in the crime was minor or he was merely an accomplice," she said in court. "All the evidence indicates he was the one that pulled the trigger."
But Garcia's attorney, Saam Zangeneh, used his closing argument to urge the jury to consider mitigating factors surrounding Garcia's involvement in the murder.
"Sigfredo was under the influence of extreme emotional or mental disturbance," said Zangeneh, noting that his longtime partner and mother of his two children, Katherine Magbanua, had recently broken up with him. "Everyone indicated that he was spiraling out of control because of his breakup with Katherine Magbanua."
Garcia didn't implicate Magbanua at trial because he wanted to protect her, Zangeneh told the jury.
Garcia was tried for murder alongside Magbanua, who prosecutors alleged helped set up the murder-for-hire that left Markel dead in July 2014. But the jury could not reach a decision on the first-degree murder charge against Magbanua, and Hankinson declared a mistrial. State prosecutors have said they will retry her, and she remains in jail.
For three weeks, prosecutors laid out the case that Charlie and Donna Adelson—the brother and mother of Markel's ex-wife, Wendi Adelson—were behind the plot to kill Markel in an effort to allow the couple's two children to relocate from Tallahassee to South Florida, where the Adelson family lives. No member of the Adelson family has been charged, and they have steadfastly denied any involvement.
Prosecutors alleged that Magbanua, who dated Charlie Adelson prior to the murder, recruited Garcia and Luis Rivera—a high ranking member of the Latin Kings gang—to travel to Tallahassee to kill Markel, for which the trio was paid $100,000. Rivera pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in 2016 and testified in court that Garcia pulled the trigger and Magbanua set it in motion.
Markel's mother, Ruth Markel, read a statement to the jury during sentencing Monday, detailing how the death of her son has altered her life.
"There's no word in the English language for someone who loses a child," Markel said in court. "Yet because of the acts of a few, our son Dan's life was cut short and we were forced to live with the unthinkable."
Garcia's defense team spent the sentencing phase laying out their client's hardscrabble upbringing, in which his father was largely absent and money was tight. Psychologist Julie Harper testified that Magbanua appeared to wield considerable control over Garcia, and that she often pressured him to provide more money to her and their children.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/aa/ed/a0f3dcb348beab10cf9a1629f79e/florida-international-university-college-of-law-767x633.jpg)
Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute read![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Law School Applications are Up Across the Country. Law Deans Aren't Sure Why Law School Applications are Up Across the Country. Law Deans Aren't Sure Why](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/86/e8/9dbda3ad4adc879d3df85fe04c55/university-michigan-law-767x633.jpg)
Law School Applications are Up Across the Country. Law Deans Aren't Sure Why
6 minute read![Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/09/books-AdobeStock-web.jpg)
Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Shame on Us': Lawyer Hits Hard After Judge's Suicide
- 2Upholding the Integrity of the Rule of Law Amid Trump 2.0
- 3Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 4Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 5AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250