Florida Law Professor's Killer Gets Life in Prison
A Tallahassee jury rejected the death penalty for Sigfredo Garcia four days after they found him guilty of murdering up-and-coming law professor Dan Markel.
October 15, 2019 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
|
Sigfredo Garcia will spend the remainder of his life in prison for the 2014 murder of Florida State University law professor Dan Markel.
A Tallahassee jury deliberated for 40 minutes before recommending a life sentence over the death penalty—the only other option available after they found him guilty of first-degree murder Oct. 11. Judge James Hankinson of the Second Circuit Court of Florida followed the jury's recommendation and officially handed down a life sentence for the first-degree murder conviction, as well as a 30-year sentence for conspiracy to commit murder, to be served consecutively with the life sentence. Garcia will not be eligible for parole.
Garcia appeared relieved when the jury delivered its recommendation. Deputy assistant state attorney Georgia Cappleman told the jury in her closing arguments during sentencing that the death penalty is appropriate because Garcia had ample time to reconsider his role in Markel's murder, which was in the works for well over a month before it happened.
"There is no evidence that this defendant's role in the crime was minor or he was merely an accomplice," she said in court. "All the evidence indicates he was the one that pulled the trigger."
But Garcia's attorney, Saam Zangeneh, used his closing argument to urge the jury to consider mitigating factors surrounding Garcia's involvement in the murder.
"Sigfredo was under the influence of extreme emotional or mental disturbance," said Zangeneh, noting that his longtime partner and mother of his two children, Katherine Magbanua, had recently broken up with him. "Everyone indicated that he was spiraling out of control because of his breakup with Katherine Magbanua."
Garcia didn't implicate Magbanua at trial because he wanted to protect her, Zangeneh told the jury.
Garcia was tried for murder alongside Magbanua, who prosecutors alleged helped set up the murder-for-hire that left Markel dead in July 2014. But the jury could not reach a decision on the first-degree murder charge against Magbanua, and Hankinson declared a mistrial. State prosecutors have said they will retry her, and she remains in jail.
For three weeks, prosecutors laid out the case that Charlie and Donna Adelson—the brother and mother of Markel's ex-wife, Wendi Adelson—were behind the plot to kill Markel in an effort to allow the couple's two children to relocate from Tallahassee to South Florida, where the Adelson family lives. No member of the Adelson family has been charged, and they have steadfastly denied any involvement.
Prosecutors alleged that Magbanua, who dated Charlie Adelson prior to the murder, recruited Garcia and Luis Rivera—a high ranking member of the Latin Kings gang—to travel to Tallahassee to kill Markel, for which the trio was paid $100,000. Rivera pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in 2016 and testified in court that Garcia pulled the trigger and Magbanua set it in motion.
Markel's mother, Ruth Markel, read a statement to the jury during sentencing Monday, detailing how the death of her son has altered her life.
"There's no word in the English language for someone who loses a child," Markel said in court. "Yet because of the acts of a few, our son Dan's life was cut short and we were forced to live with the unthinkable."
Garcia's defense team spent the sentencing phase laying out their client's hardscrabble upbringing, in which his father was largely absent and money was tight. Psychologist Julie Harper testified that Magbanua appeared to wield considerable control over Garcia, and that she often pressured him to provide more money to her and their children.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything From A to Z': University GCs Tested by Legal, Financial, Societal Challenges
6 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250