Liberal Group, Shunning Big Law, Pitches 32 SCOTUS Shortlisters
The progressive group Demand Justice is pitching a list of 32 civil rights leaders, academics, litigators and state and federal judges as would-be U.S. Supreme Court justices for any next Democratic president.
October 15, 2019 at 10:26 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Thirty-two plaintiffs lawyers, academics, state and federal judges, civil rights advocates and others, but none from Big Law, should be considered by Democratic presidential contenders for any new opening on the U.S. Supreme Court, the progressive group Demand Justice said Tuesday in pitching a list of would-be justices.
Demand Justice had said it was preparing a list of Supreme Court shortlisters, in part to spur a broader dialogue among Democratic presidential hopefuls about the high court. Then-candidate Donald Trump posted two Supreme Court candidate lists, picking primarily from prominent conservative state and federal appeals judges. Republicans widely praised Trump for his lists.
The progressive group's Supreme Court shortlist, which is not affiliated with any one Democratic candidate, includes household names in litigation, judiciary and academic circles. There are no current Big Law partners, by design, on the list.
"None of the lawyers on our list are corporate lawyers, in keeping with our call for the next president to avoid nominating any more lawyers who have been partners at corporate law firms or in-house counsel at large corporations," Demand Justice said in a statement. "Instead, our list boasts a wide range of former public defenders, public interest lawyers, academics, and plaintiff's lawyers."
Demand Justice took some criticism recently for its proposal that any next Democratic president shun nominating a current or former Big Law partner. That proposal, according to critics, "will likely exclude many first-generation black and Latino attorneys from the federal bench." The critics argued that a stint in Big Law is not an uncommon move by many young lawyers to alleviate the pressures of crushing law school debt.
The list does not include several Obama-era Supreme Court contenders, including Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, whose nomination to the high court was blocked by Republicans, and Judge Sri Srinivasan of the D.C. Circuit. Garland, a former Clinton-era Justice Department leader, had worked at the law firm Arnold & Porter; and Srinivasan is a former O'Melveny & Myers partner.
>> The Demand Justice list includes three California Supreme Court justices: Leondra Kruger; Goodwin Liu and Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar. Liu had been an Obama-era nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit but was blocked by Senate Republicans. Anita Earls, a North Carolina Supreme Court justice, was also picked.
>> Law professor Pamela Karlan of Stanford; Timothy Wu of Columbia; James Forman Jr. of Yale; and Zephyr Teachout of Fordham were among the academics picked as shortlisters. Other professors included M. Elizabeth Magill of Virginia and NYU's Bryan Stevenson and Melissa Murray.
>> Two current federal appeals court judges—Cornelia Pillard of the D.C. Circuit and Jane Kelly of the Eighth Circuit—were on the list. Two federal trial judges, Carlton Reeves of the Southern District of Mississippi, and Richard Boulware of Nevada, were named as shortlisters.
>> The list includes prominent voices in the labor and employment world: Sharon Block, a former Obama-era National Labor Relations Board member, and Jenny Yang, who served as chairwoman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission during the Obama administration.
>> The litigators on the list include Deepak Gupta of the Washington boutique Gupta Wessler. Gupta's widely recognized for his pro-consumer advocacy. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and the Philadelphia district attorney, Lawrence Krasner, were also included.
>> Civil rights leaders named to the shortlist included: Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; Dale Ho of the ACLU Voting Rights Project; and Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund was on the list, with Nina Perales, vice president of litigation at MALDEF.
>> One sitting U.S. representative—Katie Porter of California—was picked for the shortlist. Porter, a law professor, has gained notoriety for how she has questioned bank and financial executives at congressional hearings.
The next Democratic presidential debate is set for Tuesday night in Ohio, where 12 candidates will face off. None of the leading Democratic candidates has issued any sort of list similar to the one Trump first published in 2016.
Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of Judicial Crisis Network, on Tuesday called the Demand Justice list "a dream come true for far left activists."
Law professor and Supreme Court scholar Josh Blackman writes about the Demand Justice roster: "I welcome these lists. They provide the public with insights into the type of jurists an administration would consider. Though, it's difficult to know how much weight to put on Demand Justice's roster. Unlike President Trump's original list, the current list was not released–or even endorsed–by any campaigns."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All6th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
State High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 2New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 3'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 4About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 5Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250