Legal Departments Need to Adapt to Increasingly Complex, Drawn-Out M&A Deals
Today's M&A deal now drags on for an average of 38 days before closing—31% longer than the average in 2010, according to global research and advisory firm Gartner Inc.
October 16, 2019 at 03:10 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
It's high time for legal departments to adapt to the increasingly complex and global nature of mergers and acquisitions, which are taking longer than ever to finalize, according to a new study.
Today's M&A deal now drags on for an average of 38 days before closing—31% longer than the average in 2010, according to global research and advisory firm Gartner Inc.
The wait is even more pronounced for midsize deals of $500 million to $5 billion and large deals of more than $25 billion, which now take an average of 106 and 279 days to finalize, respectively.
An analysis of 23,000 transactions involving S&P companies in the past decade shows that M&A deals have become more complex, data-driven and often involve cross-border issues, according to the report. Those factors, coupled with new data regulations and compliance concerns, appear to be behind the M&A slowdown.
Mike Slipsky, a partner at Poyner Spruill in Raleigh, North Carolina, who focuses on M&A deals and reviewed the report, also suggested that the trend could be due, in part, to the availability of new tools that allow less sophisticated or smaller parties in transactions to access "really granular data" during a deal.
"And the upshot of that is that there are probably better-informed parties, particularly on the sell side," he said. "Before, they might not have known what they were agreeing to. This might be where greater availability of data has leveled the playing field a little bit."
So what can legal departments do to respond to the increasingly complex and global M&A landscape?
Expansion is one idea. Increasing in-house legal capacity makes sense for companies that are looking to handle high-volume acquisitions, according to Abbott Martin, vice president and research leader for Gartner's legal practice.
In-house leaders and firms also could develop more "agile deal teams" that can use subject matter experts more efficiently than traditional, static deal teams that work with limited or fixed expertise, the report states.
"From an in-house perspective, you can't be an expert in everything, and that's why you have outside experts. But trying to understand the lay of the land and staying on top of recent developments would be a good idea," Slipsky said.
"And, as a practical suggestion, try establishing relationships with outside experts so they can be brought in early, particularly if you know the target company is in a data-centric business or in a highly regulated industry like health care or banking," he added.
The report further recommends that legal departments beef up M&A due diligence related to cybersecurity and data protection, and adhere to a "compelling deal narrative" that is focused on the reason for the transaction and its value.
Mike DeFranco, chair of Baker McKenzie's global M&A practice group, said legal departments for companies that are beginning to eye tech-related acquisitions need to be prepared to talk with their firm's business teams about how those deals will be different from the transactions that they've done historically.
"We have a number of industrial companies that are buying tech and may even be buying startups for the first time," he said. "They may be focusing on issues that they haven't had to focus on in the past," such as intellectual property and patent matters.
Meanwhile, Baker McKenzie is predicting in its latest global transactions forecast that there will be a "slowing of the transactions pipeline" next year as M&A volume drops 25% globally. But the firm also anticipates that initial public offerings will rise in total value from $152 billion this year to $215 billion, due in large part to the expected Saudi Aramco initial bond offering.
The report states that "IPO pipelines are healthy and some firms may look to accelerate their flotation plans, fearing a renewed slump in equity prices."
Read More:
Latin American Political Shifts to Slow M&A in 2020: Baker McKenzie
Magic Circle and US Firm Lead on £215M North Sea Energy Deal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute read'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250