Wilson Sonsini and BYU Join Forces to Help Asylum Seekers
With the help of Wilson Sonsini, BYU law students this spring will create a free tool for people applying for asylum. It's the third iteration of the school's LawX legal design lab program.
October 24, 2019 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
This spring, Silicon Valley powerhouse law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is teaming up with students at Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School to help design a program that will simplify the asylum application process.
It marks the first time that BYU's three-year-old LawX legal design lab is partnering with a law firm to create a new tool to address the access-to-justice problem. In addition to Wilson Sonsini, LawX is also working with SixFifty—the law firm's software subsidiary—to support the technical side of the asylum project.
"We have been impressed by LawX and SixFifty's work in tackling important legal issues through design thinking and its ability to bring pro bono solutions to people who do not otherwise have access to legal representation," said Wilson Sonsini managing partner Doug Clark.
Project leaders are hopeful that the resulting free asylum tool will prove as popular as earlier LawX-designed resources. In its first year, LawX students created an online tool to help assist people who have been sued over unpaid debt. It followed up last year with an app that helps improve communication between tenants and landlords, with the goal of reducing evictions. Usage of both programs, which are free, has since far exceeded expectations.
"[Wilson Sonsini] is the perfect firm for this," said LawX co-director Kimball Parker, who is also the president of SixFifty. "They really care about asylum. When they heard we were doing asylum, they wanted to be involved. There are asylum experts at the firm, which means we can tap into some of the smartest legal minds in the nation on asylum. Then we can lean on the engineers and designers of SixFifty, with it all driven by these law students."
The LawX legal design lab is among a growing number of programs at law schools that task students with harnessing technology to address legal problems. The courses require students to evaluate the legal issues at play and the barriers that clients face, and to conceive apps and tools that help close that justice gap—placing them in the dual role of attorney and engineer. Stanford Law School has an interdisciplinary Legal Design Lab and offers several courses for students. Suffolk University School of Law's Legal Innovation and Technology Lab functions as a consultancy and research and development lab centered on legal tech. And Georgetown University Law Center has since 2013 hosted the Iron Tech Lawyer Invitation, in which student teams from around the country present their technology solutions to legal problems, just to name a few.
In the LawX course, students begin by researching the legal topic at hand, which this spring is asylum. They will speak with immigration judges, advocates, attorneys who represent clients in asylum cases, as well as people seeking asylum, Parker said. Next, they will brainstorm how best to help asylum seekers before creating prototypes of technology solutions, then perfecting them. SixFifty helped create last year's landlord and tenant communication app, but never before have the BYU students had access a law firm to help them work through the legal issues.
"This is like no other class they've ever had," Parker said. "There is almost no syllabus. We know, generally, what steps we're going to go through, but I don't know what we're going to do each day."
Asylum was a natural topic for LawX to focus on, given that the law school already does work on the immigration front, said law dean Gordon Smith. Teams of law students and faculty travel to the country's largest detention center in Dilley, Texas, several times a year to interview women seeking asylum. Additionally, the school's Law Community Legal Clinic offers direct representation to clients in immigration matters, thought a partnership with Deseret Industries.
"There are hundreds and thousands of people in the U.S. who are here, and maybe have good cases for asylum, but they can't afford an attorney or don't know how to fill out the paperwork," Parker said. "I think we can make a really big difference for them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 2Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 3Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 4Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
- 5'Big Law Had Become Too Woke': Why Bill Barr Moved On
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250