'Inconsistent With Our Values:' Russia Ambassador Nominee, a Big Law Vet, Grilled Over Trump's Ukraine Dealings
"Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent—I don't think that would be in accord with our values," said John Sullivan, a former co-leader of Mayer Brown's national security practice.
October 30, 2019 at 02:53 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
John Sullivan, a top U.S. State Department official and former Mayer Brown partner nominated to serve as the U.S. ambassador to Russia, appeared on Wednesday to disavow President Donald Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, telling a Senate panel it would not be "in accord with our values" to ask a foreign government to probe a political rival.
Testifying at his confirmation hearing, Sullivan stopped short of directly denouncing Trump, saying he was unsure of whether the president had leveraged U.S. military aid as part of an alleged quid pro quo, which is now at the center of a House impeachment inquiry. Trump has denied he engaged in any unlawful or untoward conduct in his dealings with Ukraine.
Under questioning from Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, a top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations, Sullivan, said the "concept of investigating a political rival … that would be inconsistent with our values."
"Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent—I don't think that would be in accord with our values," said Sullivan, a former co-leader of Mayer Brown's national security practice.
Sullivan's appearance before the Senate panel came as House investigators pressed forward with an impeachment inquiry centering on Trump's dealings with Ukraine.
In closed-door sessions, nearly a dozen State Department and other administration officials have testified about a July phone call in which Trump appeared to ask the president of Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son Hunter. The testimony has also addressed a shadow foreign policy overseen by Trump's personal lawyer Rudolph Giuliani, along with efforts to oust the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch.
Menendez asked Sullivan whether he knew that Giuliani was "seeking to smear" Yovanovitch.
"I believe he was, yes," Sullivan answered.
Later in the hearing, he added: "My knowledge in the spring and summer of this year about any involvement of Mr. Giuliani was in connection with a campaign against our ambassador to Ukraine."
Sullivan said he informed Yovanovitch, a career diplomat, of the Trump administration's decision to remove her from her post. When he inquired about why she was being removed, Sullivan said he was told only that the president had lost confidence in her. He pressed for further detail and received the same answer.
"I was told that he had lost confidence in her. Period," Sullivan said.
Sullivan noted that the president has broad authority to remove ambassadors, at one point acknowledging that his testimony could rankle Trump and prompt the White House to pull his nomination.
"He may decide he doesn't like my testimony today and doesn't want me to go to Russia," Sullivan said.
Sullivan joined the State Department in 2017 as deputy secretary of state following his departure from Mayer Brown. In financial disclosures, Sullivan revealed that he earned more than $650,000 in salary and bonus from the firm between 2016 and 2018. Sullivan's wife is a government investigations partner at King & Spalding in Washington.
Sullivan was nominated in October to replace Jon Huntsman, a former Republican governor of Utah, as the top diplomat in Moscow.
Early in his testimony, Sullivan said he did not organize a statement of support for Yovanovitch around the time of her removal, drawing an admonishment from Menendez. "I would've hoped that you would've spoken up a lot more loudly," Menendez said.
At a lighter moment in the hearing, Sen. Tim Kaine D-Virginia, raised the decisive seventh game in the World Series between the Washington Nationals and Houston Astros. Sullivan said that, while he's lived in Maryland for years, his baseball loyalties lie with his "Boston heritage."
"I just wanted to note that, until tonight, the pending World Series champions are the Boston Red Sox," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250