Legal's Cloud Concerns Are Growing, but Adoption Isn't Slowing Down
Legal's use of cloud computing is expanding, but lawyers' concerns over cloud's security, control and cost is also growing, according to a new American Bar Association survey.
October 31, 2019 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
This may sound like a broken record, but a new report found lawyers have cloud computing concerns.
To be sure, more lawyers are leveraging cloud computing for their work, according to this year's American Bar Association's "Legal Technology Survey Report" released last week. Indeed, according to the ABA, 58% of respondents said they are using cloud computing for work-related tasks, an increase from the 2018 report's 55% and 2016's 38%.
But despite an uptick in usage, the ABA also found lawyers' concerns with cloud are also growing. The ABA survey found that "confidentiality/security" was the top cloud concern for firms, rising from 2018's 47% to this year's 50%.
Law firm tech consultants said that uneasiness is warranted. They argue that most law firms, such as solo practitioners and small law firms, lack the subject-matter expertise to truly vet cloud-based providers to understand the cloud's risk and best practices.
"As you have more people collaborating across different platforms, someone else's bad cybersecurity practices could have a negative impact on you, even when you are doing everything right," said Dennis Kennedy, president of Dennis Kennedy Advisory Services, a legal innovation consulting company. "And the threats have become so much more difficult to deal with and more common at the same time."
Kennedy noted law firms' sensitive client data can easily place them in cybercriminals' crosshairs, but rather than proactively addressing those concerns, most firms haven't taken the initiative to understand cloud-based providers' security practices.
"I always tell people if you look at a YouTube five-minute video, you would understand how the security measures they have are infinitely greater than what you can do at your firm. I think people don't have an understanding about the security in the cloud and have an inflated sense of what they can control," Kennedy said.
"You have to ask questions about the cloud to know how protected you are or not," added Sharon Nelson, president of digital forensics, IT and cybersecurity provider Sensei Enterprises Inc. "If you are Big Law you have cybersecurity experts probably on staff, you have someone on staff that knows the questions to ask."
Ross Bruch, a wealth planner and Philadelphia Bar Association technology chair, agreed. He said that all law firms should try to figure out "how to properly vet their third-party vendors, because you don't know how much exposure you have to risk when you are relying on the security systems of third-party vendors."
But as Nelson noted, big firms are more likely to have personnel assigned to track and manage cloud services than smaller firms.
"When you get to midsize and smaller firms, there could be one person wearing many hats," said Kleinbard partner Jennifer Zegel. "When you pile on those different roles, it could be difficult to manage and stay abreast of the latest cloud innovations."
The survey also noted 50% of respondents cited a lack of control over data as a cloud concern, a 3% uptick from last year's survey results. Legal Cloud Technology Inc. president Pegeen Turner said it's a significant hurdle for some firms to give up direct control of their data.
"There's always concerns moving to the cloud where they can't physically see their servers in the office," she said.
Slightly more respondents to the ABA survey this year also reported the cost and effort of switching from existing solutions as a concern, which grew from 2018's 18% to this year's 20%.
"I think that is a bit of a fallacy that moving to cloud is going to save [you] so much money," Turner said. Instead, law firms save by relying on their cloud service provider to maintain, update and backup the files and infrastructure, she noted. "Cloud computing won't save them necessarily money, but it saves them from the headaches of people watching the shop."
Bruch added that the ABA survey also noted an uptick in clients having concerns about firms using the cloud. He said he wasn't sure if clients were just formerly oblivious to their counsel's cloud usage, but it was notable because it added more responsibility onto lawyers.
"It's a sign clients are becoming more knowledgeable and as so, law firms need to become more knowledgeable."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readJudge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250