SEC's Newest Whistleblower Charges Spotlight Investors as Potential Tipsters
"The SEC's whistleblower protections broadly protect not just employees, but anyone who seeks to report potential securities law violations to the commission," said Jane Norberg, the chief of the SEC's whistleblower office.
November 04, 2019 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday charged a company and its chief executive with unlawfully trying to stop investors from reporting misconduct to federal regulators, an enforcement action that expands on whistleblower protection efforts that have been largely centered on employees.
In an amended complaint, filed in Manhattan federal district court, the SEC tacked on charges against the online auction portal Collectors Cafe and its CEO Mykalai Kontilai, who had been accused of making a fraudulent securities offering and misappropriating investors' money. The SEC alleged that Collectors Cafe conditioned the return of money to investors who signed agreements that they would not report potential misconduct to the commission or other government agencies.
"In one of these instances," the SEC said in the amended lawsuit, "Collectors Café and Kontilai even went so far as to file a lawsuit claiming that the victims breached the confidentiality provision by communicating with SEC staff about possible securities law violations."
Kontiliai's defense lawyer, Hughes Hubbard & Reed senior counsel Edward Little, declined to comment Monday. Collectors Cafe is represented by Gage Spencer & Fleming partner William Fleming, who also declined to comment on the new charges.
The new charges mark the first time in more than two years that the SEC has taken an enforcement action over alleged attempts to stymie communication with the commission. Previous enforcement actions centered on severance agreements, struck between companies and outgoing employees, with language the commission viewed as having a chilling effect on those employees coming forward with information about their former employers.
"The SEC's whistleblower protections broadly protect not just employees, but anyone who seeks to report potential securities law violations to the commission," said Jane Norberg, the chief of the SEC's whistleblower office.
The SEC's whistleblower office was created as part of the Dodd-Frank reforms that followed the financial crisis. Under the rules of the program, whistleblowers can receive between 10% and 30% of monetary sanctions received in an enforcement action. Since 2012, the SEC has awarded 66 tipsters, doling out nearly $400 million in whistleblower awards.
The SEC last brought a whistleblower-related enforcement action in January 2017, when the commission reached a $500,000 settlement with Home Street Inc. resolving claims that the financial services company used improper accounting methods and took steps to prevent whistleblowing.
According to the SEC, the company required former employees to sign agreements requiring them to waive their ability to receive a whistleblower award or risk losing their severance payments and other post-employment benefits.
In another notable settlement, Anheuser-Busch InBev agreed in 2016 to pay $6 million to resolve claims that it paid illegal bribes to build business in India and entered into a separation agreement that stopped an employee from continuing to voluntarily cooperate with the SEC's investigation.
Speaking at a recent conference in Washington, Norberg said companies appear to have learned from the settlements and removed language from separation agreements that could be read as deterring employees from contacting the SEC.
"I really do think everyone did a good job in taking a hard look at these agreements and figuring out what was the appropriate language," she said.
"That said, we do still see some, and we are still looking at them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
4 minute readCFPB Alleges Berkshire Hathaway Subsidiary Originated Unaffordable Housing Loans
Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250