This McKinsey/Lean In Report Will Make You Depressed and Frustrated
There are some bright spots—sort of—in the report, now in its fifth year. But mostly, it's a big downer.
November 04, 2019 at 05:11 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
For five years, McKinsey & Co. and LeanIn.Org have been issuing their annual report on women in the workplace. During those years, women have been urged to lean in—and many did just that. Then, the #MeToo era erupted with a force mightier than many of us could have imagined, toppling the mighty, including leaders in Big Law.
So what's the upshot of all this on women's place in the workforce? Practically nothing. Perhaps it takes more than five years to see the impact, but for now women don't have much to show in the way of progress.
In fact, you might say that the fifth year anniversary report of the McKinsey/Lean In studies is an anticlimax, if not a total downer. (The report looked at data and other information from 600 companies.)
There are some bright spots—sort of. According to the report, there was a 29% jump in the representation of women at the C-suite. That seems like an enormous leap, except that it translates into about one woman for every five executives overall in the C-suite. And yes, that 21% rate for female C-suiters is about the same rate for female equity partners in Big Law. It's not that the progress is so great but how ridiculously low the measuring point was.
As for women outside of the C-suite, one word comes to mind: Stagnation. One big reason women aren't making it to the top is what the report calls the "broken rung" phenomenon in which women have difficulty getting past the entry level. The report notes that only 72 women are hired and promoted for every 100 men. (This is analogous to what happens in law firms where women tend to thin out in the more senior ranks.)
The report makes a number of suggestions to improve the situation for women. Among them are setting goals for promoting women, requiring diverse slates for hiring and promotion, training for unconscious bias, establishing clear evaluation criteria and preparing women for leadership. Yada. Yada.
You've heard most of those suggestions 100 times before—and they are all good proposals. But here's the recurring issue: What are the chances that they'll be implemented in a meaningful way?
Based on my reading of the report, we're a long way off. For one thing, women seem to be on a totally different page from men and the HR leaders at their workplace. Here's what the report says:
Women believe they're judged by different standards than men. Of women, 40% cited different standards as the issue, while only 14% of men and 32% of HR managers thought so.
Few women believe that there aren't enough qualified women for promotions. Only 13% of women say a lack of qualified women is the problem, in contrast to 21% men and 45% of HR managers.
Lack of sponsorship is a huge factor holding women back in the opinion of HR managers, but less so for women, and almost negligible for men. Among HR leaders, 47% say lack of sponsorship is the biggest challenge, for women it was 32%, while for men it was just 12%.
My interpretation of all this? Women feel ready for advancement, but the system isn't promoting them. There's a fundamental unfairness at work, the women seem to be saying. But that's not widely shared by the men or the people in control.
One common ground, though, is that very few people now believe women aren't willing to do what the job requires. Only a tiny percent of women, men and HR managers believe that women aren't advancing because of their attitude about work. (Only 3% of both women and men, and 1% of HR managers says women aren't working as hard.)
But here's what I see as an overarching problem: Companies seem to think that going through the motions of promoting gender equality is enough. The report finds 87% of companies say they "are highly committed to gender diversity." While the report says it's "encouraging that so many companies prioritize gender diversity," it notes that only half of employees are convinced it's truly a high priority.
Despite these underlying tensions, the report says that "employees are overly optimistic about the state of women," with some 19% of employees and 11% of HR leaders believing that gender parity has already been reached at the senior level, and 31% of both groups saying that it will be achieved in two to five years.
But here's the sobering note in the report: Unless the broken rung is fixed, "We are many decades away from reaching parity, if we reach it at all."
"If we reach it at all"—if that's not a chiller, I don't know what is.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChange Is Coming in the Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
6 minute read'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
The Growing Antitrust Scrutiny of DraftKings and FanDuel
Trending Stories
- 1Low-Speed Electric Scooters and PIP, Not Perfect Together
- 2Key Updates for Annual Reports on Form 10-K for Public Companies
- 3When Words Matter: Mastering Interpretation in Complex Disputes
- 4People in the News—Jan. 28, 2025—Buchanan Ingersoll, Kleinbard
- 5Digital Assets and the ‘Physical Loss’ Dilemma: How the Fourth Circuit’s Ruling on Crypto Theft Stands at Odds With Modern Realities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250