On the way out of a photo booth set up for a “Mother’s Day” event at a restaurant, Linda Maher tripped and fell, hitting her head on the corner of a wall.
Her lawyer sued and asked a jury for $11 million. But defense attorney Casey Quillen had come prepared: She filed a motion in limine to prevent Maher’s lawyer from using what she called “reptile theory” strategies at trial. Defense attorneys say plaintiffs attorneys use the theory to incite jurors’ survival instincts, emotions and fears by appealing to their “reptilian brains,” often in reference to safety or community concerns. They do this to obtain larger, and often unexpected, jury awards, sometimes referred to as “nuclear” verdicts, defense attorneys say.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
