Gordon Caplan Gets Hearing in Bid to Avoid Disbarment Stemming From College-Admissions Scandal
The Appellate Division, First Department held that Caplan's offense qualified as a "serious crime" that warranted immediate suspension, but also granted his request for a hearing as to "why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made."
November 07, 2019 at 02:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Gordon Caplan, the former co-chairman of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, will be allowed to make his case for why he should not be disbarred over his role in a nationwide college admissions bribery scandal, a New York state appeals court ruled Thursday.
Caplan pleaded guilty in May to paying a consultant $75,000 to rig his daughter's ACT score and is currently serving a one-month prison sentence on conspiracy and fraud charges. A federal judge in Boston also ordered Caplan to pay a $50,000 fine and do 250 hours of community service as part of his sentence.
Caplan agreed to an interim suspension from the practice of law in New York but is trying to keep open an avenue to reinstatement.
New York law makes disbarment automatic for conviction of a state felony, or a crime "essentially similar" to a state felony, but the state's Judiciary Law does allow Caplan to argue that his actions didn't meet that standard. In August, he and his attorney, Michael Ross, requested a hearing to present mitigating evidence that would weigh against the most severe sanction.
On Thursday, the Appellate Division, First Department held that Caplan's offense qualified as a "serious crime" that warranted immediate suspension, but also granted his request for a hearing as to "why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made."
The hearing, set to take place before a court-appointed referee, would be held within 90 days of Caplan's release from prison, the appeals court said. All disciplinary proceedings are held in private, and it would ultimately be up to the appellate division to make a final determination on liability and sanctions.
Ross, who is representing Caplan in the disciplinary matter, said his client was the first defendant criminally charged in the scandal to publicly accept responsibility for his actions. Caplan, he said, planned to present evidence of his past good deeds as well as remedial efforts he is taking to show that he would not offend again.
"Mr. Caplan agreed to the interim suspension and looks forward to presenting all the facts to the court so that a fair and appropriate sanction can be imposed on him," Ross said.
Caplan reported Monday to a low-security prison in Pennsylvania, where he is expected to serve out his sentence. He is set to be released no later than Dec. 5.
Caplan was one of about 50 parents implicated in the FBI's "Operation Varsity Blues" investigation, which ensnared actresses Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, as well as other wealthy and influential parents across the country.
Caplan was arrested by the FBI on March 12 and soon after resigned from Willkie. In his sentencing memo, Caplan said that his home and auto insurance company pulled his coverage and JPMorgan and Citibank have closed his accounts. He said in court that he felt ashamed, and he apologized for "act[ing] as if I believed my wealth and privilege allowed me to ignore the rules that apply to everybody else."
David Lewis, an legal ethics attorney who practices in Manhattan, said the First Department would particularly consider whether Caplan had taken "proactive" measures to remedy his violations. Typically, that could mean taking classes or engaging in community and volunteer work.
However, mitigating evidence is specific to the individual attorney, and a lawyer's case can often be bolstered by taking remedial steps directly related to the underlying conduct. For Kaplan, he said, that could mean working with students or to increase equity and fairness in the standardized testing process.
"There really is no script," said Lewis, of David A Lewis Law. "The more directly related the remedial measures are to the underlying conduct, the more credible it is that the person is sincere in trying to remedy what the underlying conduct was," Caplan said.
In New York, an attorney can be publicly censured, suspended for a period of up to five years or disbarred for up to seven years. There is no permanent disbarment in the state.
Read More:
What's Next for Gordon Caplan?
Ex-Willkie Co-Chair Gordon Caplan Gets Prison Term in College Admissions Case
Ex-Willkie Co-Chair Gordon Caplan Asks Judge to Spare Him Prison
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Pay What Is Owed': State Appellate Court Affirms $19M Verdict for Software Contractor
5 minute readCalifornia's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250