Assistant General Counsel for University of North Texas Faces Backlash Over Racial Slur
Caitlin Sewell is under fire for using the n-word as an example of protected speech during a First Amendment discussion titled, "When Hate Comes to Campus."
November 08, 2019 at 01:53 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
An assistant general counsel of the University of North Texas System has resigned Friday after calls for her to lose her job started mounting when students said she used a racial slur during a discussion about free speech and civil discourse.
While speaking on stage at an event Thursday night titled "When Hate Comes to Campus," assistant GC Caitlin Sewell, who is white, told students in attendance that "it's impossible to talk about the First Amendment without saying horrible things."
Then, according to an audio recording posted on Twitter, she added, "Um, you know, 'You're just a dumb n—r and I hate you.' That alone, that's protected speech." In a video from the event posted on Twitter, students become outraged and Sewell attempts to apologize.
"I did not mean to, by any means, offend anyone. I wish I had censored that word. It came out without thought … I literally have never said that word in a public setting before, and I was trying to be real," she said, before being interrupted by shouting students.
The school's student newspaper, North Texas Daily, which broke the story, reported that Daniel Ojo, a representative of the student government association, said Sewell switched over to using the term "f-word" for the remainder of the discussion.
"So, you didn't censor the n-word, but you definitely censored f—," Ojo said. "Like, what's more damaging to people?"
Attempts to speak with Sewell were not immediately successful. She joined UNT in 2017, after leaving Houston law firm Roger, Morris & Grover, where she'd practiced employment law following a stint as a Texas state prosecutor. A partner at the firm, Clay Grover, spoke with Corporate Counsel on Friday about his time working with Sewell.
"Based on everything I know about Caitlin, she would not have had any offensive intent. She is an excellent attorney and wonderful person," he said.
UNT president Neal Smatresk issued a written statement Thursday night in which he acknowledged that "a member of the UNT System legal staff used a racial epithet that was not reflective of the values of our university community.
"While the individual was trying to make a point about First Amendment speech, this language is never condoned in our community which prides itself on our diversity and caring nature," he added.
Smatresk's response to the controversy appeared to further fan the flames, drawing widespread criticism on social media amid growing calls for Sewell to be fired or resign.
University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey Stone said in an interview Friday that he used to use the n-word while teaching free speech courses. But he said he stopped last year after speaking with African American students and friends.
"I came to the view that I misunderstood how distracting and hurtful it can be," he said. "What I decided was telling this particular anecdote, which was by no means necessary to what I was teaching, but simply and example that seemed useful, was not worth it given the distracting and negative effect it had simply from a pedagogical standpoint."
Considering the UNT situation, Stone said he believed that, for Sewell, "this is an educational moment in which she now understands something she didn't understand before.
"The more instances like this there are, the more people become cognizant of it," he added.
This story has been updated to show Sewell had resigned from her position.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250