9 Things to Know About a New Regulator Group That Might Like You
The Retirement Security Working Group could also push for new producer education requirements.
November 12, 2019 at 04:24 PM
4 minute read
Saving for RetirementThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
A new state insurance regulator panel, the Retirement Security Working Group, is set to have its first public conference call meeting at 1 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time Wednesday. The working group is part of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Life Insurance and Annuities Committee. The working group is supposed to "explore ways to promote retirement security consistent with the NAIC's continuing 'Retirement Security Initiative,'" according to the group's official charges. If you sell annuities or life insurance-based savings arrangements to retirement savers, you too are trying to promote your clients' retirement security. In theory, that means that you and the working group could have at least some goals in common. The NAIC is a Kansas City, Missouri-based group for state insurance regulators. It has no direct authority to set insurance rules, but states often start with NAIC's models when developing insurance laws, regulations and procedures. In some cases, states arrange to have certain NAIC measures, such as technical changes in insurance accounting rules, apply automatically. Here are seven things to know about the new working group, for agents and brokers.
1. The NAIC created it in August, at its summer meeting in New York.
Stephen Taylor, the insurance commissioner for the District of Columbia, told members of the Life Insurance and Annuities Committee that starting a working group would help the NAIC act on an ongoing Retirement Security Initiative. He said that several other commissioners already wanted to join the working group, and that one thing that the working group could do would be to draft a document describing the challenges facing America's retirement savers and retirees. (Related: NAIC Creates a Retirement Security Working Group)
2. The working group has its own section on the NAIC's website.
The working group's website section is available here. The Meeting Materials tab includes a link to the NAIC's Calendar system. Members of the public can pay to get access to the calls.
3. The working group has eight founding members.
In addition to the District of Columbia, the jurisdictions participating in the working group are Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, New York state, Rhode Island, Utah and Washington state.
4. The agenda for the meeting includes a presentation by Vince Shorb of the National Financial Educators Council (NFEC).
NFEC is a financial literacy program provider. The clients listed on its website range from Transamerica to the Salvation Army.
5. The working group could review existing state consumer protection laws.
The working group members and practical constraints will shape what the new working group really does. Taylor suggested at the NAIC's summer meeting that the working group might inventory state laws that apply to retirement-related transactions, to identify places where new laws or amendments could enhance consumer protection.
6. The working group could help regulators reach out to consumers.
Taylor suggested that the working group could help develop a public media retirement security campaign, and a retirement security curriculum that could emphasize the importance of saving, minimizing debt, and planning for long-term care expenses.
7. The working group could add to continuing education requirements for agents and brokers.
Taylor said the working group could help develop exam questions for producers in connection with topics such as needs analysis and suitability.
8. The working group could help develop new income planning concepts.
Taylor said the working group could work with another group for regulators, the Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Commission, to work with the IIPRC to develop ideas for new lifetime income products.
9. The working group could listen to insurers' concerns.
Taylor said the working group could help facilitate a forum that would give insurers and other industry participants a chance to talk about topics such as regulatory obstacles. — Read Annuity Group's Third Video Focuses on 'Family Readiness', on ThinkAdvisor. — Connect with ThinkAdvisor Life/Health on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250