Legal Timekeeping Startup Ping Raises $13.2 Million in Series A Round
Only three years old and two years removed from Mishcon de Reya's Lab program, the company said plans to use the funding to hire new employees to its current 30 person team.
November 12, 2019 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
It's not just contract or e-discovery technologies that are seeing increased investment from Silicon Valley—processes like time and billing are getting attention as well.
Today, artificial intelligence-powered timekeeping software Ping announced it has raised $13.2 million in a Series A funding round. The round was led by Upfront Ventures, with participation from existing investors BoxGroup, First Round Capital, Initialized Capital and Ulu Ventures. The round brings Ping's total funding to $17.4 million, following its seed round in 2017.
Ping's software automates the timekeeping process by integrating with products that attorneys use for work on both desktop and mobile, and developing a timesheet for review. The AI component comes in as the software "learns" how attorneys work, and distinguishes between personal and professional activities. The company claims to help customers record an additional 32 billable minutes of legal work per attorney per day, and estimates the Ping software can integrate with the tech stack of about 1,000 firms.
For Ping CEO Ryan Alshak, becoming the top player for timekeeping in Big Law is the company's first goal. But beyond that, he told Legaltech News the company is focusing on "giving back to our clients data around how much something should cost preemptively. We like to say, if you're going to get rid of the billable hour, you first have to understand it, and that's what timekeeping is."
Ultimately, Alshak said he views the value proposition of Ping as all about data. "I think where our real value lies, because of our machine learning structure and data, is giving firms back that accurate and structured data on where time is being spent in order for them to build meaningful tools on top of the data to actually solve their problems."
With its new funding, the company said it plans to hire a number of new employees to its current 30 person team, primarily focused on quality, support and senior leadership of its engineering team. Recent hires include Somik Raha from investor Ulu Ventures who now leads Ping's Deployment efforts, and Michael Mizono, who was the first product designer at Nest and left Google to join Ping as head of design.
"The main goal for the Series A is to start scaling operations to start winning the market," Alshak said. "In order to do that, we need to make sure that our engineering team in particular is capable of supporting an enterprise software that can scale to 1,000 law firms."
Originally founded in 2016 in San Francisco, Ping was a member of the 2017 Lab program at London-based law firm Mishcon de Reya. Around that time, the company invested in securing patent protection> for its technology and entering new markets and firms. This year, the company was named to The National Law Journal's 2019 list of Top Emerging Legal Technologies.
In recent years, both the number of legal technology companies receiving funding and the overall amounts of funding have exploded, and the momentum does not seem to be slowing down. Funding has been secured in a number of different parts of the legal workflow this fall, ranging from contract management (Ironclad, $50 million) to litigation funding (Legalist, $100 million) to online legal marketplaces (Australia's Lawpath, $3 million).
But for Alshak, legal is just the first market of many he wants Ping to tackle. "If we do our job right, in five years, we won't be a legal tech company and we won't be a timekeeping company," he said. "The big winner in legal won't be a legal company; it will be an enterprise software company that has legal as one of its verticals. For us, timekeeping is the wedge to collect the data that we talked about earlier to actually really change industries."
Editor's Note: This article has been updated with comment from Ping CEO Ryan Alshak.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
Turning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250