Legal Timekeeping Startup Ping Raises $13.2 Million in Series A Round
Only three years old and two years removed from Mishcon de Reya's Lab program, the company said plans to use the funding to hire new employees to its current 30 person team.
November 12, 2019 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
|
It's not just contract or e-discovery technologies that are seeing increased investment from Silicon Valley—processes like time and billing are getting attention as well.
Today, artificial intelligence-powered timekeeping software Ping announced it has raised $13.2 million in a Series A funding round. The round was led by Upfront Ventures, with participation from existing investors BoxGroup, First Round Capital, Initialized Capital and Ulu Ventures. The round brings Ping's total funding to $17.4 million, following its seed round in 2017.
Ping's software automates the timekeeping process by integrating with products that attorneys use for work on both desktop and mobile, and developing a timesheet for review. The AI component comes in as the software "learns" how attorneys work, and distinguishes between personal and professional activities. The company claims to help customers record an additional 32 billable minutes of legal work per attorney per day, and estimates the Ping software can integrate with the tech stack of about 1,000 firms.
For Ping CEO Ryan Alshak, becoming the top player for timekeeping in Big Law is the company's first goal. But beyond that, he told Legaltech News the company is focusing on "giving back to our clients data around how much something should cost preemptively. We like to say, if you're going to get rid of the billable hour, you first have to understand it, and that's what timekeeping is."
Ultimately, Alshak said he views the value proposition of Ping as all about data. "I think where our real value lies, because of our machine learning structure and data, is giving firms back that accurate and structured data on where time is being spent in order for them to build meaningful tools on top of the data to actually solve their problems."
With its new funding, the company said it plans to hire a number of new employees to its current 30 person team, primarily focused on quality, support and senior leadership of its engineering team. Recent hires include Somik Raha from investor Ulu Ventures who now leads Ping's Deployment efforts, and Michael Mizono, who was the first product designer at Nest and left Google to join Ping as head of design.
"The main goal for the Series A is to start scaling operations to start winning the market," Alshak said. "In order to do that, we need to make sure that our engineering team in particular is capable of supporting an enterprise software that can scale to 1,000 law firms."
Originally founded in 2016 in San Francisco, Ping was a member of the 2017 Lab program at London-based law firm Mishcon de Reya. Around that time, the company invested in securing patent protection> for its technology and entering new markets and firms. This year, the company was named to The National Law Journal's 2019 list of Top Emerging Legal Technologies.
In recent years, both the number of legal technology companies receiving funding and the overall amounts of funding have exploded, and the momentum does not seem to be slowing down. Funding has been secured in a number of different parts of the legal workflow this fall, ranging from contract management (Ironclad, $50 million) to litigation funding (Legalist, $100 million) to online legal marketplaces (Australia's Lawpath, $3 million).
But for Alshak, legal is just the first market of many he wants Ping to tackle. "If we do our job right, in five years, we won't be a legal tech company and we won't be a timekeeping company," he said. "The big winner in legal won't be a legal company; it will be an enterprise software company that has legal as one of its verticals. For us, timekeeping is the wedge to collect the data that we talked about earlier to actually really change industries."
Editor's Note: This article has been updated with comment from Ping CEO Ryan Alshak.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readJudge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
How Dana Rao Built a 'Yes' Culture at Adobe and Why He Walked Away
Keker Secures Defense Win for EDA Software Company Real Intent in Synopsys Copyright Infringement Case
Trending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 3Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 4Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 5Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250