'Penn Law' Eyes Compromise Amid Outcry Over Name Change
A law school spokesman said Tuesday that "Penn" could return to the school's shorthand but that reverting to "Penn Law" is not on the table.
November 12, 2019 at 11:41 AM
3 minute read
Penn Law might be sticking around after all, at least in some form.
Administrators at the newly dubbed University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School told students at a campus meeting Monday that they are considering modifying the new official "Carey Law" shorthand after widespread criticism of the decision to ditch "Penn Law." No decision has been made on what the new nickname might be.
The Carey Law nickname was adopted last week, after the school announced a $125 million donation from the W.P. Carey Foundation—the largest donation to a U.S. law school of record. But backlash against Carey Law came swiftly, and by Monday more than 1,000 students and alumni had signed a petition calling for the return to Penn Law. (The official shorthand name appears on law school merchandise and documents, among other things.)
Dean of students Felicia Lin told law students during Monday's information session with students that there are "ongoing discussions" about the law school's shorthand name, according to the Daily Pennsylvanian.
Law school spokesman Steve Barnes said in a statement Tuesday that "Penn" could return to the school's shorthand, but that reverting to "Penn Law" is not on the table.
"Now that the gift is public, we are considering various options to ensure Penn remains a prominent and integral part of our shorter form names, while recognizing the historic Carey gift, so that we can simultaneously embrace tradition and transformation," Barnes wrote. "So, by definition, it will not be 'Penn Law' alone, and we look forward to ongoing discussions with our community members in the days and weeks ahead."
The petition requests a return to the Penn Law shorthand on the grounds that the name has both history and name recognition, but does not take issue with the formal rebranding of the school as the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School or the donation that sparked the name change. However, some students and alumni have criticized law school and university officials for what they deem a lack of transparency over the process of securing the monetary gift.
"The undersigned would like to preserve the brand recognition, over century-long history, and clear association with the University of Pennsylvania that comes with the name Penn Law," reads the petition.
The petition also points out that the University of Maryland's law school also bears the Carey name. (It became the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law in 2012 after the same foundation donated $30 million.)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250