Faegre Baker Daniels, Drinker Biddle in Merger Talks
The combined firm would have nearly 1,200 lawyers and over 400 equity partners in 22 offices.
November 13, 2019 at 07:52 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Minneapolis-based Faegre Baker Daniels and Philadelphia-based Drinker Biddle & Reath have been engaged in merger talks, both firms confirmed Wednesday night.
The combined firm would have nearly 1,200 lawyers and over 400 equity partners, according to data from ALM Intelligence. A merger would likely push the combined firm into the Am Law 50, based on both firms' financial performance last year.
In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Drinker Biddle and Faegre Baker said: "Drinker Biddle & Reath and Faegre Baker Daniels are in discussions but have nothing further to report at this time."
On the surface, the potential deal appears to be a merger of near-equals. Faegre, with more than 660 lawyers and gross revenue of $512.9 million in 2018, ranked No. 71 on the Am Law 100, and Drinker Biddle, with 530 lawyers and $449.7 million in gross revenue last year, was ranked No. 79.
Profits per equity partner for the two firms are quite close as well: Faegre reported PEP of $896,000 for 2018, and Drinker Biddle's PEP was $916,000.
The combined firm would have 22 offices. Both firms have offices in Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. London was previously another area of overlap, but Drinker Biddle closed that office earlier this year.
According to publicly available website domain registration records, the domain name "FaegreDrinker.com" was registered Oct. 16.
Sources in Indianapolis and Minneapolis, the two cities hosting Faegre's largest offices, indicated that a vote hadn't taken place yet.
These sources indicated that the potential merger between the two firms was being frequently discussed by their competitors, with one source saying lawyers at seven different firms have called him to discuss the potential Faegre-Drinker merger.
Drinker Biddle has seen some significant departures in the last 18 months or so. First, a 14-lawyer group focused on life insurance and annuities, which made a move to another Philadelphia-based Am Law 100 firm, Cozen O'Connor, in April 2018.
Just a few months later, four Philadelphia partners and one San Francisco partner took their national class action defense practice to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
Dealmaker Robert Juelke left Drinker Biddle in April of this year, heading to the Philadelphia office of Hogan Lovells. And in September, eight more insurance transactions partners left Drinker Biddle to join McDermott Will & Emery in London and New York.
But the firm hasn't only suffered losses. In March it added 17 litigators from Carlton Fields, led by Washington-based James Jorden and Frank Burt.
Following the 2018 departures, Drinker Biddle reported lackluster financial results. Gross revenue was down 2.6% in 2018 from the year before, though revenue per lawyer was up thanks to decreased head count, and profits per equity partner dipped by 1.1%.
Faegre Baker was created by a merger between Minneapolis-based Faegre & Benson and Indianapolis-based Baker & Daniels.
Since its 2012 merger, Faegre has seen a tidal wave of law firms set up shop in Minneapolis. In 2019 alone, Greenberg Traurig, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, and Spencer Fane all opened offices in the city. It's been a hotbed for mergers too. Most recently, the city saw one of its oldest local firms, Gray Plant Mooty, announce a merger with Kansas City-based Lathrop Gage. And Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister announced in August that it will be merging with Minneapolis-based Briggs and Morgan, creating a 600-person law firm starting Jan. 1.
Indianapolis has also seen its share of consolidation. Earlier this year, Dentons announced that it was planning to expand its U.S. presence by combining with regional law firms—one of its first announced combinations was with an Indianapolis-headquartered firm, Bingham Greenebaum Doll.
And it's a busy time for law firm mergers involving the Philadelphia market as well. Philadelphia-based Pepper Hamilton and Atlanta-headquartered Troutman Sanders confirmed Wednesday that they are also in merger talks.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
- Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP
- Saul Ewing
- Briggs and Morgan
- Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard
- Greenberg Traurig
- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Spencer Fane Britt & Browne
- Pepper Hamilton
- Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A
- Faegre Baker Daniels
- Taft Stettinius Hollister
- Dentons
- Jorden Burt
- Lathrop & Gage
- Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.
- Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
- Cozen O'Connor
- Troutman Sanders
- Hogan Lovells
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250