Jeffrey Epstein Guards Charged With Faking Records on Night of His Death
Tova Noel and Michael Thomas were accused in a 20-page indictment of preparing records to make it appear as though they were conducting mandatory counts of prisoners in the special housing unit of Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center.
November 19, 2019 at 12:04 PM
6 minute read
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan have charged two corrections officers with falsifying records on the night Jeffrey Epstein died in U.S. custody, while he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges.
Guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas were accused in a 20-page indictment of preparing records to make it appear as though they were conducting mandatory counts of prisoners in the special housing unit of Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center, when in fact they had not, according to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
The false records were filed repeatedly on the night of Aug. 9 and Aug. 10, the indictment states.
Epstein, the Manhattan and South Florida-based financier accused of trafficking underage girls and young women for sex, was found hanging in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in the early hours of Aug. 10. The city medical examiner later determined that Epstein had died by suicide, though an expert hired by Epstein's brother has claimed the death was more consistent with homicide by strangulation.
"As alleged, the defendants had a duty to ensure the safety and security of federal inmates in their care at the Metropolitan Correctional Center," said Geoffrey S. Berman, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. "Instead, they repeatedly failed to conduct mandated checks on inmates, and lied on official forms to hide their dereliction."
Epstein was transferred to suicide watch following an apparent suicide attempt July 23 but was moved back to special housing a week later. To safeguard against further attempts, he was assigned to the cell closest to the corrections officers' desk.
Guards at the jail are required to conduct institutional counts of inmates in each housing unit and perform rounds in the special housing unit every 30 minutes to ensure that every inmate is alive and counted for.
According to the indictment, no counts or rounds were conducted between 10:30 p.m. Aug. 9 to 6:30 a.m. Aug. 10. Instead, prosecutors said, Noel and Thomas sat at their desk, browsed the internet and milled about the common area.
When Epstein was discovered at 6:30 a.m. Aug. 10, Noel told her supervisor that she and Thomas failed to complete their 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. rounds. According to the indictment, Thomas tried to take the blame for his colleague, saying "I messed up, she's not to blame, we didn't do any rounds."
Epstein was transferred to a local hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
Both the indictment and public statements from the U.S. attorney's office Tuesday fully endorsed the medical examiner's finding that Epstein had committed suicide by hanging. But prosecutors also publicly laid out, for the first time, details about how security at the special housing unit would have functioned on the night of Epstein's death.
MCC's special housing unit, or SHU, the indictment said, is divided into six separate tiers on the jail's ninth floor. Each tier, the filing said, features eight cells, capable of holding two prisoners each.
According to the indictment, access to the SHU is controlled by a locked door that can only be opened by a guard at MCC's control center on the first floor. A second locked door can only be accessed by guards who are assigned to the SHU and carry keys while on duty.
According to the indictment, Epstein's cellmate had been moved out of MCC on Aug. 9 for a "routine, pre-planned transfer. Despite instruction from the prison's psychology staff, no new inmate had been assigned to Epstein's cell in the other man's absence.
Prosecutors said that Noel and Thomas, the only two officers working the overnight shift, were required to conduct five institutional checks and then complete corresponding the paperwork to verify the counts. The indictment said that surveillance video of MCC showed Epstein returning to his cell following an attorney visit. Noel and an unnamed officer, the filing alleged, never conducted the required count at 10 p.m., when Epstein and his fellow inmates were locked down in their cells for the night.
The two guards nonetheless completed their report without ever entering the tier in which Epstein was housed.
"As confirmed by video obtained from the MCC's internal video surveillance system, this was the last time anyone, including any correctional officer, walked up to, let alone entered, the only entrance to the tier in which Epstein was housed until approximately 6:30 a.m. on August 10," the indictment said.
According to the filing, Thomas replaced the unnamed officer around 10 p.m. as the only other guard on duty in the SHU. Prosecutors alleged that, following the shift change, Noel and Thomas submitted two fake slip counts and signed 75 entries falsely certifying that they had conducted their rounds at the required 30-minute intervals.
"Completing rounds to verify inmate counts and certifying the accuracy of logs are important tasks to ensure the safety and security of institutions and the well-being of inmates," Guido Modano, the special agent in charge of the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General, said.
"Those who shirk their duties but falsely state they have completed them place the institution, fellow employees, inmates and the public at risk," he said.
In a press release, prosecutors said Noel and Thomas surrendered to authorities Tuesday morning. Both face multiple counts of falsifying records and conspiring to defraud the government by impeding the functioning of MCC.
Thomas, who has served as a corrections officer since 2007, faces six counts in total, and Noel, who has worked at MCC since 2016, was charged with four counts in the indictment.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office said he did not know who was representing the defendants. The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York.
The public corruption unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office in handling the prosecution, with assistant U.S. attorneys Rebekah Donaleski and Nicolas Roos assigned to the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250