DLA Piper Leads Big Law in Social Media as More Firms Shun Facebook: Report
New research from Good2bSocial finds law firms getting savvier with digital marketing, but with plenty still to master.
November 19, 2019 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
DLA Piper outdid its competitors in digital marketing in 2019, according to a new report, while law firms in general are using Facebook far less and using LinkedIn, Instagram and paid social marketing more. Firms are also measuring the impact of their social marketing efforts more closely, the report found.
Consultancy Good2bSocial has released the annual report card, the Social Law Firm Index, since 2013, though this year it includes more firms than ever. The group measures law firms' social media reach, engagement, and marketing performance on their own websites and on public social media platforms.
The latest rankings, released Tuesday, place DLA Piper at No. 1, followed by White & Case, Norton Rose Fulbright, Baker McKenzie and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
Norton Rose Fullbright, which topped the overall rankings last year, came in first in 2019 when it came to "thought leadership," while Baker McKenzie led the pack in SEO optimization.
Ranked by their reach and engagement on individual platforms, Squire Patton Boggs was No. 1 for Twitter, Quarles & Brady for Facebook, Baker McKenzie for LinkedIn, Jones Day for YouTube and DLA Piper for Instagram.
By now, the researchers noted, major firms are already marketing themselves on most if not all of the major social media platforms. Now that adoption is widespread, the firms are beginning to get more sophisticated with usage, the report found.
Guy Alvarez, Good2bSocial's founder and CEO, said that more firms are taking advantage of automated marketing systems such as Hubspot or Pardot to improve management of leads and to fine-tune messaging by office and practice.
He also said the most successful firms are beginning to dig deeper into performance metrics to gauge their return on investment.
"Law firms are actively doing things on social media, but very few know how to measure ROI and how to use [social media] as a marketing campaign to get the results they want," Alvarez said in an interview. "Before you figure out what your ROI is, you need to know what your business purposes are."
He said firms typically use social media for one or more of four reasons: to build brand awareness, to generate more leads, to provide more value to clients through cross-selling practice areas and to help differentiate themselves from their competition.
Each of those goals can require a different strategy and a different platform, he said, depending on the audience and the desired outcome.
Alvarez also said that although adoption rates are high, law firms often lag behind other professional service industries, particularly the Big Four, when it comes to effective usage.
"A lot of firms are still using social media as sort of a one-way content marketing tool," he said. "The ones that struggle are just putting up promotional content. Social media is meant to engage and be social."
Alvarez said the firms that struggle the most tend to have a couple of things in common. First, they usually make decisions that are not based on data. They miss out on opportunities to course-correct or change strategies if a campaign doesn't bear fruit. If you don't check the data, he said, how will you know if it is working?
Another common pitfall is a basic lack of content—whether on a firm's website, within lawyer biographies or on social platforms. Having content that is robust, useful to clients and search-friendly can go a long way in driving traffic to a firm's site, he said.
While social media can be a marketing blessing, Alvarez also said there are also elements that can make it dangerous.
"If some bad news about your firm is out there, it will get around quick," he said. "Getting on top of that can be difficult." He also said that firms can be concerned about what their attorneys might write that could come back to haunt them (see: Frank Aquila).
Alvarez said more and more firms are putting social media training into their professional development programs and hiring consultants to work with attorneys to maximize their marketing advantage and avoid social media peril.
While many of the latest trends aren't brand new, there were some elements from the 2019 report that Alvarez didn't see coming, he said.
He said he was surprised at how many firms had "jumped on the Instagram bandwagon." Firms such as DLA Piper and White & Case have done a good job, he said, of telling stories on the platform and even using it as a recruiting tool.
On the flip side, "I was surprised at how much and how quickly firm usage of Facebook has declined," Alvarez said. "Cambridge Analytica and privacy issues helped move that along. We saw some decline last year, but this year was a huge drop. Some firms have given up on Facebook completely."
For top-ranked Good2bSocial firm DLA Piper, which spent years beating back a Facebook lawsuit when Mark Zuckerberg was at his peak, that may just be the icing on the cake.
Download the full report here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
'Rocket Docket': EDVA Judge Controls Google's Fate in Ad Tech Monopoly Trial
4 minute readInfluencers Putting Companies on Hot Seat by Demanding 'Reverse' Morals Clauses
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Media Law Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump and Carr’s FCC
- 2Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 3Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 4Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 5People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250