Recruiter Sues Freshfields, Claiming Credit for Cleary Rainmaker's Move
Boston Executive Search Associates claims it introduced Freshfields to M&A dealmaker Ethan Klingsberg in late 2018 but was never paid for its efforts.
November 19, 2019 at 06:07 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
A legal recruiting firm that claims it played a key role in the move by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton partner Ethan Klingsberg to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer last month sued the law firm in federal court on Tuesday, saying it put Klingsberg on the firm's radar and hasn't been paid.
Boston Executive Search Associates wrote in its complaint that it was contacted in July 2018 by Mitchell Presser, the U.S. head of global transactions at Freshfields, and worked for more than a year to try to build up the Magic Circle firm's corporate team in the U.S. The recruiting firm said it discussed Freshfields with more than 300 candidates and put 35 of them on Freshfields' radar, resulting in seven meetings.
ESA claims that Justin Morimoto, a vice president at the recruiting firm, told Klingsberg about the opportunity at Freshfields in November 2018 and got a positive response. When Morimoto shared the news of its positive reception with Presser, he "expressed great interest in recruiting Klingsberg," the suit said.
"Presser told plaintiff ESA that he considered attorney Klingsberg to be an outstanding lateral partner candidate," the Boston federal district court suit said. But "later that afternoon"—referring to events on Nov. 7, 2018—"Presser told plaintiff ESA to 'hold off' further efforts regarding Ethan Klingsberg, indicating that defendant Freshfields was not interested in his candidacy."
The search firm alleged it contacted Freshfields after news of the move by Klingsberg and several other partners came out on Oct. 25, 2019, nearly a year after their initial conversations. But Presser "asserted that he had no recollection of discussing Klingsberg with plaintiff ESA on Nov. 7, 2018," and further claimed to have an email that showed another recruiter told Freshfields about a possible opportunity with Klingsberg before that date.
ESA, Presser and a representative for Freshfields didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Mark Rosen, a recruiter who has been credited with placing Klingsberg at Freshfields, said in a phone interview Tuesday that he worked for more than a year to recruit Klingsberg. He said he wasn't familiar with ESA and would be "shocked" if its allegations against Freshfields were true.
ESA has previously sued Simpson Thacher & Bartlett over a partner placement fee of over $900,000 that it claimed to have been wrongfully denied. That matter appears to have been settled.
ESA is represented in its suit against Freshfields by Douglas Salvesen of Yurko, Salvesen & Remz, who also represented the recruitment firm in the Simpson Thacher case.
|Read More
Lockstep Model is Doomed, Says Recruiter Behind Cleary Rainmaker's Move
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250