Amid Buyers' Market, Litigation Funders Find Traction With Smaller Firms
While the supply of capital may be outstripping demand for now, a litigation finance broker thinks growing awareness will lead to greater adoption.
November 20, 2019 at 05:17 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Small law firms have mostly been the ones driving the boom in commercial litigation finance, according to a new report on the industry from broker Westfleet Advisors.
In collecting data on several dozen commercial litigation funders active in the U.S. market, Westfleet found that 70% of the capital committed by litigation funders over a 12-month period spanning 2018 and 2019 went to firms outside of the Am Law 200.
In a connected finding, the broker also highlighted the popularity of portfolio deals that fund a collection of cases being handled by a particular law firm; 47% of capital committed over the study period took the form of law firm portfolios. These are predominantly employed by firms who have or are looking to build contingency-fee practices.
"It's a function of the fact that smaller law firms are more willing to entertain contingency fee arrangements than larger law firms," said Westfleet managing partner Charles Agee III.
Westfleet attempted to collect data from the 41 commercial litigation funders it identified as being currently active in the U.S. market. The vast majority contributed information via a third party which was then kept confidential as it was aggregated. The buyers guide also includes capsule summaries of over 30 funders.
Based on these efforts, the broker found that the industry had a total of $9.5 billion in assets under management dedicated to commercial litigation finance. Of that total, in the past year $2.3 billion was committed to commercial litigation finance transactions with a nexus to the U.S.
For Westfleet, that disparity suggests that the supply of capital available is outpacing the current rate of deployment, and it indicates that funders feel pressure to increase their pace of deployment.
That, in turn, indicates a buyers market for the users of commercial litigation finance, both law firms and entities that have viable claims they'd be eager to pursue if attorneys fees were not an issue.
"I think funders are going to be reluctant to compete on price so you'll see them competing on process. That will make for a better overall user experience and will be better for the overall industry," Agee said.
But Agee doesn't anticipate the buyers market to continue indefinitely, particularly as players in the marketplace gain a fuller picture of how litigation finance operates in differing contexts.
"Awareness of litigation funding is very, very high. It's nearly 100%," he said. "But the depth of understanding necessary for lawyers to bring up with clients or for in-house lawyer to take litigation finance as an option to the C-suite, that can be addressed through education."
One area of opportunity is corporate portfolios. Only 15% of capital currently committed is in portfolios from corporations and other entities such as universities. But as corporations gain comfort with using litigation finance to unlock the value of claims, the tides could turn and demand could ultimately outpace supply.
"I don't think it's going to happen overnight," Agee said. "It will take years, not months, to really achieve the depth of understanding in the market to bring demand up to its potential."
|Read More
Litigation Finance Users Say They'd Do It Again, Survey Finds
CFOs Fueling Rise of Litigation Finance, Survey Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
- 2Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 3Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 4Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 52 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250