Asian Fintech Market Heats Up as US Market Cools
In Asia, fintech investment climbed from 98 in the second quarter to 152 in the third quarter. At the same time, the U.S. saw its numbers drop from 166 to 156, according to a new global fintech report from data firm CB Insights.
November 20, 2019 at 03:18 PM
4 minute read
The global financial technology market appears to be booming, especially in China, which has seen a new surge in investment after falling into a slump earlier this year.
But the market isn't so hot in the U.S., where fintech deals have fallen to an 11-quarter low, according to the latest global fintech report from New York-based data firm CB Insights.
Fintech funding for the third quarter of this year reached nearly $9 billion globally, which is an all-time quarterly high when excluding Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. affiliate Ant Financial Services Group's $14 billion funding round during the second quarter of 2018.
So far this year, fintech has raised $25.6 billion, which already eclipses 2017's total of $18.8 billion.
Fintech deals in Asia climbed from 98 in the second quarter to 152 in the third quarter. Deals in China increased by more than 160% quarter over quarter, from 21 to 55. At the same time, the U.S. saw its deals drop from 166 to 156.
"In Asia, the market demand continues, especially when it comes to addressing the unbanked and the respective governments' push in the region when it comes to financial inclusion," said Donna Parisi, global head of finance and fintech at Shearman & Sterling in New York.
"The region also has a bigger pool of capital available due to large investors such as Ant Financial and SoftBank," she added.
The report notes a decrease in early-stage deals in the U.S., a trend that played out globally during the third quarter. The pullback on early investment in fintech is expected to cause the number of deals in 2019 to fall short of the record in 2018, which recorded 1,967 deals, compared with 1,387 so far this year.
"In the U.S., many investors are taking a wait-and-see approach for market consolidation to take place before investing further into new fintechs," said Alan Bickerstaff, a partner in Shearman's emerging growth, capital markets and M&A practices.
"Corporate investors have also not been seeing solutions that are as applicable to their long-term strategies, which has led to an overall decline in corporate venture capital this quarter," added Bickerstaff, who is based in Austin, Texas.
Huhnsik Chung, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in New York who has clients in the fintech industry, linked the slowdown in early-stage investment to "maturity and discipline on the investor side" of the equation.
"If you look at the new ventures starting up in the U.S. and Asia, there are more companies that have appeared in the U.S. marketplace as opposed to a lot of the ongoing enterprises out in Asia. I think that's impacting where the money's going," he added. "I think investors are becoming much more savvy."
Latin America was the fintech star for the second quarter of this year, when fintech funding in the region hit a six-quarter high of $481 million across 23 deals, surpassing both China and India for the first time. Several LatAm fintech startups drove the growth.
For the third quarter, Southeast Asia stepped up and set a new annual record with $701 million raised across 87 deals. Also noteworthy: India reclaimed its crown for the top country for fintech funding in Asia with $674 million. In China, which had more deals than India, funding totaled $661 million.
Back in the U.S., fintech funding for the year reached $12.9 billion through the third quarter, surpassing the total of $12.5 billion in 2018, which saw 762 deals compared with 513 so far this year.
In the fintech hubs of California and New York, mega-round funding, which has driven funding in earlier quarters, cooled during the third quarter, according to the report. In California, funding dropped from more than $2.9 million in the second quarter to $2.2 million in the third. The decline in New York was $1.5 million to $495,000.
"Many are fresh off of mega-rounds in 2019, which helps explain the pullback," the report states. "NY also saw deals drop to 38 while CA saw a boost to 67 deals from early-stage deals."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 2Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 3Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 42 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 5Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250