Attorney Mental Health: 'Thanksgiving' Isn't Just a Holiday
The idea behind a gratitude practice is easy enough: It means taking time to think intentionally about positive events and people in your life.
November 21, 2019 at 02:15 PM
5 minute read
Lawyers are hardwired to notice the negative in every situation.
But then Thanksgiving comes around, with its tradition of reflecting on the year and expressing gratitude for the good things in life.
And experts ask: What if the Thanksgiving feeling lasted all year?
They say the season creates positive emotions and can increase connections to loved ones. It's a welcomed reprieve from the high-stress, adversarial profession that has created a lawyer population suffering from depression, anxiety and substance use disorders at rates higher than the general population.
"Lawyers, more so than others, need to be more intentional about cultivating positive emotions," said Anne Brafford, a former equity partner in Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, who's transformed herself into a positive psychology Ph.D. student and lawyer-wellness aficionado.
|Gratitude Resources
|- Discover potential benefits of starting a gratitude practice.
- Read about different forms of gratitude practices, and pick one to start.
- For journaling, search an online retailer for "gratitude journal" and order one.
- If you're more of an app person, try the Gratitude Journal by Happy Tapper.
- Find tips for gratitude journaling at Greater Good Magazine.
- Take a "gratitude quiz" to measure your baseline, and retake the test in three weeks to track your progress.
- For a deep dive, read "Gratitude Works!" by Robert A. Emmons, a preeminent researcher in the field.
The idea behind a gratitude practice is easy enough: It means taking time to think intentionally about people and positive events that create feelings of thankfulness. One of the well-known iterations of the practice is called, "Three Good Things," where attorneys keep a journal that explains the events that made them grateful and the reasons why. While some people practice gratitude every day, researchers have found the practice less effective when it becomes a chore.
Once per week is enough, as long as the lawyer keeps it up, according to Brafford.
As people create a habit of scanning their environments for good things, they grow a different interpretive lens that makes them better appreciate positive events, said Brafford, founding member of Aspire, a California-based educational and consulting firm for the legal profession. Because they often express their appreciation for other people, they form closer relationships, which help them in times of stress, she said.
Also, grateful people have less time to dwell on the negative. This helps combat a widespread phenomenon known as negativity bias, which means that people tend to notice and react more to negative events, according to Brafford. People need to experience three to five positive emotions for every one negative emotion, since the negative is so much more powerful, explained Brafford.
Bree Buchanan, senior adviser at Krill Strategies, a legal consulting firm that focuses on attorney well-being, said when she launched her gratitude practice she decided to add a layer of accountability to strengthen her commitment to the practice.
She and a friend joined as "gratitude buddies" and would spend about five or 10 minutes drafting short emails to each other, three times per week, to express something that made them grateful and explain why.
Other people keep up their gratitude practices by writing their thanks in a notebook, purchasing a "gratitude journal," or using an app on their smartphones.
After about three weeks, Buchanan noticed a change in her internal dialog. For example, during a long commute, rather than steaming about the bad traffic, she started dwelling on what she might express in her gratitude email when she arrived at work.
The item didn't have to be earth-shattering. For example, Buchanan works in Austin, where summer temperatures climb past 100 degrees. One day, she wrote that she was grateful she worked in air conditioning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Health Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 2When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 5Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250