GM General Counsel, Kirkland Attorneys Leveraged US Corruption Probe to Sue Fiat Chrysler
On Wednesday the GM lawyers filed a federal racketeering lawsuit against Fiat Chrysler, accusing Fiat of "a systemic and near decade-long conspiracy to bribe senior union officials to corrupt the collective bargaining process and labor relations" to GM's detriment.
November 21, 2019 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Carefully tracking a yearslong U.S. attorney's probe into corruption at the United Auto Workers, General Motors Co. general counsel Craig Glidden and his outside counsel at Kirkland & Ellis began to see a pattern emerging.
On Wednesday the GM lawyers revealed what they saw in a federal racketeering lawsuit filed against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV. The suit accuses Fiat Chrysler of "a systemic and near decade-long conspiracy to bribe senior union officials to corrupt the collective bargaining process and labor relations," to GM's detriment.
In short, the suit alleges Fiat Chrysler paid bribes to corrupt the union bargaining process to win concessions and other favorable treatment not granted to GM, using the union to try and financially force GM into a merger.
The suit paints Fiat Chrysler's late CEO, Sergio Marchionne, as the mastermind behind the alleged conspiracy. For several years Marchionne had sought a merger with GM, but the company always rebuffed him.
Fiat Chrysler released a statement in response to the GM suit, saying, "We are astonished by this filing, both its content and its timing. We can only assume this was intended to disrupt our proposed merger with [French carmaker PSA Peugeot] as well as our ongoing negotiations with the UAW."
The statement added, "We intend to vigorously defend against this meritless lawsuit and pursue all legal remedies in response to it."
The company did not immediately respond to messages, but on Thursday Fiat Chrysler chairman John Elkann told reporters in Turin, Italy, that the Peugeot merger will move forward and that "we are not worried" by the lawsuit, according to the Associated Press.
At Detroit-based GM, Glidden was unavailable for comment. But in a statement after filing the suit, he said, "We have alleged in the complaint that Mr. Marchionne is responsible for conceiving, executing and sponsoring the alleged wrongdoing. We have no present intent to pursue the UAW. Our focus is on FCA. We believe the responsibility firmly rests on the orchestrater of the wrongdoing … and we plan to hold FCA responsible."
Glidden added, "This lawsuit is intended to hold FCA accountable for the harm its actions have caused our company and to ensure a level playing field going forward." The harm included unfair labor costs and other operational advantages, according to the suit.
The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Michigan, where the U.S. Attorney's Office has been conducting a multiyear investigation into union corruption. So far the investigation has led to convictions of seven union personnel and three Fiat Chrysler executives.
It was filed by Hariklia Karis, a litigation partner in Kirkland's Chicago office, and other Kirkland attorneys, along with the Detroit law firm Honigman. Karis did not immediately return messages Thursday.
The defendants are FCA US LLC, based in Auburn Hills, Michigan, and its parent company, Fiat Chrysler. GM also named the three convicted Fiat Chrysler executives—Alphons Iacobelli, Jerome Durden and Michael Brown—as co-defendants in the suit.
Hours after the suit was filed, UAW president Gary Jones resigned, though he is not mentioned in the complaint.
Earlier this month, federal prosecutors charged retired UAW vice president and former GM board member Joseph Ashton with fraud and money laundering as part of the investigation. He also is not mentioned in the GM complaint.
GM did not ask for a specific dollar amount, but the suit seeks damages, "including but not limited to the billions of dollars in damages GM suffered as a result of defendants' bribery scheme, pattern of racketeering, and other unlawful acts" plus punitive damages, restitution, costs and other fees.
In addition, the U.S. statute covering racketeering allows a court to treble the damage award against a losing defendant, raising a potential for tens of billions of dollars in damages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
7 minute readState High Court Reinstates $7M Jury Verdict for Passenger Injured in Potentially Avoidable Crash
4 minute readShareholder Democracy? The Chatter Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Is Spurring Between Lawyers and Clients
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250