Stripped of ABA Accreditation, Thomas Jefferson Law School Plans to Stay Open
The ranks of American Bar Association-accredited law schools in California are shrinking, with San Diego's Thomas Jefferson School of Law becoming to latest to fall off the list.
November 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The Golden State has lost two American Bar Association-accredited law schools within the span of a week.
Thomas Jefferson School of Law will no longer have the ABA's seal of approval as of Dec. 17—the day after the fall semester ends. The announcement about the San Diego law school from the ABA's Section of Legal Education and Admission to the Bar follows a decision Nov. 18 by the trustees at the University of La Verne to convert its law school to one accredited by the State Bar of California and drop its ABA-accredited status.
Like La Verne, administrators at Thomas Jefferson said Friday that the school will remain in operation as a California-accredited campus, thus avoiding the fate of Arizona Summit Law School in Phoenix, which closed in 2018 shortly after losing its ABA accreditation. Program requirements for California accreditation are easier to meet than the ABA's accreditation standards, but the change means graduates of both schools won't be able to sit for the bar exam outside of California, at least initially.
"Although the law school will no longer admit students into the Juris Doctor program as an ABA-approved school, the law school will continue its 50-year tradition of educating successful and diverse lawyers who serve as leaders in the community and in access to justice," reads a statement issued by the law school.
The revocation of Thomas Jefferson's ABA accreditation was not unexpected. The ABA's legal education council in May voted to withdraw accreditation from the stand-alone law school for failing to comply with its admissions, governance and academic program standards. But the law school appealed that decision and remained accredited during the appeals process. Thomas Jefferson secured accreditation from the State Bar of California in advance the ABA's revocation and has also applied for accreditation from the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
"The law school is disappointed by the appeals panel's decision, and is focused on ensuring that its current students will graduate pursuant to an ABA-approved teach-out plan here at Thomas Jefferson School of Law," the statement reads.
Struggling law schools in California have more options than campuses in other states. The state bar maintains its own accreditation process that allows graduates of those schools to take the bar exam, which is unique among jurisdictions. (Graduates of California-accredited law schools may take the bar in 19 other jurisdictions, but only after first passing the California test, then meeting other requirements such as a number of years in practice.) In June, interim Thomas Jefferson law Dean Linda Keller acknowledged that becoming California accredited would likely hurt enrollment at the school, which has already seen the size of its classes shrink dramatically over the last eight years. Thomas Jefferson enrolled 1,066 students in 2011, which had dwindled to 326 in 2018—a decline of more than 69%, ABA records show.
With the departures of Thomas Jefferson and La Verne, the roles of ABA-accredited law schools in California will drop to 18. Whittier Law School in Costa Mesa is in its final year of operation after university officials decided to close it down amid declining enrollment and financial challenges. Meanwhile, the number of California-accredited law schools will soon increase to 23 with the two new additions.
Graduates of California-accredited law schools largely struggle to pass the bar exam. Just 26% of first-time bar takers from those schools passed the July 2019 California bar exam, while that figure was 71% for graduates of ABA-accredited law schools.
Thomas Jefferson must now submit a teach-out plan to the ABA, which details how all current students will complete their degrees, according to a Nov. 21 notice announcing the decision. The school noted that other campuses that have lost ABA-accreditation have been allowed to confer degrees to current students. Thomas Jefferson plans to move ahead with its spring semester, and next fall will admit new students as a California-accredited law school.
The past decade has been an extremely difficult one for the once-prospering San Diego school. It was riding high in the late 2000s when officials decided to build a new, state-of-the-art campus downtown for which the school borrowed heavily to finance. That $90 million campus opened in 2011, the year after Thomas Jefferson hit its peak enrollment and the start of the seven-year decline in national law school enrollment. The law school struggled to meet its debt obligations in the ensuing years.
In a bid to rein in costs, the school vacated its seven-year-old campus in 2018 and relocated into a 24-story downtown San Diego office building—a move the school said would erase its massive debt load. Administrators also said they were increasing the academic credentials of incoming students and investing more heavily in bar preparation, but those measures appear not to have swayed the ABA.
"The law school looks forward to continuing its rich tradition of educating strong classes of diverse attorneys and providing much-needed service to the community," the school's statement reads.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 2Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 3Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 42 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 5Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250