Hogan Lovells Lines Up New CEO To Succeed Steve Immelt
The appointment is due to take effect in July.
November 26, 2019 at 08:54 AM
2 minute read
Hogan Lovells' board has unanimously recommended a successor to its outgoing CEO, Steve Immelt.
The board has vouched for Hong Kong-based finance partner and Asia-Pacific and Middle East chief executive Miguel Zaldivar.
The recommendation is subject to a mandatory partnership vote, the outcome of which is expected in December. However, a person with knowledge of the voting process said it is "highly unlikely" that the recommendation will fail.
Zaldivar can expect to start his four-year term on 1 July 2020, at which point Immelt, who has served as CEO since July 2014, will step down.
Immelt and deputy CEO David Hudd are expected to retire shortly after the transition, according to the person.
Last month, Law.com's Legal Week broke the news that six partners were in the running to succeed Immelt, three of whom were London-based, with the remaining candidates hailing from Hong Kong, Washington D.C. and Madrid.
Zaldivar, who joined legacy Hogan & Hartson's Miami office as partner in 2002, relocated to Hong Kong last year where he was appointed regional chief executive.
He has held many other senior positions at the firm, including developing the Latin American practice and co-leading the infrastructure, energy, resources and projects practice.
In a statement, Zaldivar said: "I am extremely passionate about the firm and its success and that starts with its clients and ensuring the service we deliver to them is consistently of the highest quality.
"We are in a unique position with the depth of our practices worldwide to be the adviser of choice for clients who need their lawyers to be tuned into the financial, commercial, regulatory and political dynamics of their industries and markets."
Hogan Lovells' chair Leopold von Gerlach added: "Miguel has a long commitment to the firm and has a clear sense of his priorities as our proposed CEO including among others, focusing on client service, investment in our key markets, incentivizing collaboration across the partnership, managing our profitability and supporting diversity and inclusion".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
- 2Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 3Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 4Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 52 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250