Law Schools Are the Latest Battleground for Gender-Neutral Bathrooms
Students at Seattle University School of Law and the University of Minnesota Law School are pushing to have some restrooms converted for all to use, following the efforts at Yale Law School.
November 26, 2019 at 02:41 PM
4 minute read
|
At Seattle University School of Law, students who want to use one of the school's two fully accessible gender-neutral bathrooms must travel up to the third floor of the law library via a specific stairwell or elevator.
At the University of Minnesota Law School, students seeking one of the school's two gender-neutral bathrooms must go to the library's fourth floor—a trip that can take up to 10 minutes.
Students on both campuses are lobbying administrators to add gender-neutral restrooms, following in the footsteps of Yale law students who successfully pushed to add the school's first multi-stall gender-neutral restrooms earlier this year. Yale in February dedicated two new such restrooms, which required a legal challenge to a Connecticut building code that mandated a certain number of restrooms for men and women in every building.
Their counterparts at Seattle and Minnesota hope to achieve similar success. More than 400 people have signed a petition asking Seattle Law Dean Annette Clark to convert the school's single-gender restrooms into gender-neutral ones. The petition was circulated by Seth Alexander, a transgender student who said that he is uncomfortable using gendered restrooms and that the remote location of the existing two gender-neutral stalls means he often doesn't have the time to access them. Alexander acknowledged that the change may be uncomfortable, at least initially.
"Bathrooms are an unavoidable part of all of our lives, and everyone should have reliable, convenient access to bathrooms," the petition reads. "This is merely the next step that the law school can take to realize its goal of advancing social justice. De-gendering bathrooms is good for everyone of all genders. In the meantime, increasing knowledge and awareness of the gender-neutral bathrooms in the law school is equally important."
Clark met with Alexander and responded to the petition earlier this month with a message to students that said the school is committed to safe and accessible restrooms for everyone, and that the issue should be considered further, according to the university newspaper.
"I think the fact that we are engaging in these conversations is healthy, but there are real emotions operating among members of our community who have differing views and experiences on these questions, and so I ask that we practice civil discourse and care for others as we engage in discussion (especially on social media), as befits a community of professionals and colleagues," Clark wrote.
Meanwhile, Minnesota's Law Council—the law school's student governing body—is leading the charge to add gender-neutral restrooms to its campus. The group sent a letter to administrators Nov. 12 asking for the conversion of three existing restrooms into gender-neutral ones. (It does not request that all restrooms in the law school become gender-neutral.)
Law Dean Garry Jenkins released a statement to students Nov. 22 saying that administrators are reviewing the law school's infrastructure to see if more gender-neutral restrooms can be added, and that they hope to have a decision by February, according to the Minnesota Daily.
"As always, we want to partner with students in collaborative efforts to improve the environment and culture at the Law School," said Jenkins' statement. "I encourage all members of our community with ideas on building a more welcoming and inclusive environment to communicate with law school leadership."
Yale Law School's OutLaws, an organization that supports lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer members of the law school community, spearheaded the addition of gender-neutral restrooms to campus. But the effort took three years. The group began pushing for more such bathrooms in 2016, but ran up against state building codes. Eventually, then-Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy intervened on the school's behalf.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readFederal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
4 minute read'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250