Photo: Shutterstock.comReport: 'Top-Tier Firms' Provided Afterpay With Incorrect Legal Advice, Resulting in Money Laundering Breach
Dentons was one of the firms that advised Afterpay, but the firm said the advice it provided in 2016 was in line with industry practice at the time.
November 26, 2019 at 07:09 PM
2 minute read
The advice provided by global law firm Dentons to Australian fintech company Afterpay resulted in breaches of Australia's Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act regulations, an auditor has found.
But Dentons said the advice it provided in 2016 was in line with industry practice at the time.
The board of Afterpay Touch commissioned independent auditor Neil Jeans, principal of compliance adviser Initialism, to look into the breaches after it was ordered to do so by the anti-money laundering regulator, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), once the breaches came to light.
Jeans' report on the breaches stated: "Afterpay's compliance with its AML/CTF obligations was, from the outset and over time, based upon legal advice from top tier Australian law firms."
He said the initial legal advice concluded that Afterpay's business model was factoring receivables from merchants, so Afterpay initially focused its AML/CTF controls upon merchants.
"I am of the opinion this initial legal advice was incorrect," he wrote in a summary of his report to the Afterpay Touch board. "The initial legal advice provided to Afterpay did not reflect Afterpay's business model."
Afterpay provides loans to consumers in order to purchase goods from merchants, the auditor stated, and this has a different set of compliance obligations.
"Dentons was one of several firms that has acted for Afterpay," Dentons said in a statement. "Dentons is supportive of AUSTRAC's ongoing commitment to corporate compliance. Dentons considers the advice given to Afterpay was in line with the firm's understanding of Afterpay's business model and the law and industry practice."
Baker McKenzie also provided advice to the firm but said it did not do so at the time in question.
"References to the independent auditor's report regarding Afterpay's early non-compliance with anti-money laundering rules occurred at a time in which we [Baker McKenzie] were not advising the company on such matters," the firm said in a statement.
The auditor concluded that Afterpay is a low-risk business and is now compliant with the AML/CTF obligations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute read
Florida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 2Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 3Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 42 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 5Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
