A survey of consumers and health care professionals reveals both groups are worried about the state of the U.S. health care system as it enters an election year. Patients and health care providers alike seem to agree there are serious cost and access issues, and respondents say they will support policymakers who will address these concerns. The survey results were released by Wolters Kluwer, an international technology and consulting company. The firm's report, "Mending Health Care in America 2020: Consumers and Cost," said there are both agreements and divisions in how patients and providers view health care. Related: Consumers expect big increases in college and health care costs "Leading up to the 2020 presidential election, there has been a shift in attitudes surrounding out-of-control health care costs and a complicated and opaque health care system that erodes the trust of consumers and providers," said Diana Nole, CEO of Wolters Kluwer, Health. "Our national survey echoes this dissatisfaction, but also illuminates that those on the front lines of delivering care are taking diverging, and sometimes conflicting, paths to mitigate their concerns and prioritize actions." |
A pressing concern
The Wolters Kluwer survey talked to more 1,000 consumers and 837 health care professionals, including nurses, nurse directors, physicians, and hospital executives. The survey showed clearly that respondents see addressing health care issues as a high priority when it comes to next year's elections. The study found that 73 percent of respondents said the issue of health care will be a main factor when they vote for a presidential candidate. A whopping 89 percent of consumer respondents said the U.S. health care system needs an overhaul. The report said 78 percent of all respondents said they will vote for a presidential candidate who will respond to rising health care premiums and high deductibles. And 81 percent of consumers said they believe uncertainty surrounding health care policy impacts the quality of care patients receive. |
Costs at top of mind for both groups
Both groups surveyed showed awareness of how geographical and other differences affect health care. The report said 63 percent of consumers don't believe they would pay the same for a treatment or condition regardless of where they receive care. And 98 percent of all those surveyed agreed that there are substantial differences in costs and how care is delivered, making this a national problem. For consumers, the challenge of costs has a direct impact on how they follow treatment plans. The survey showed 52 percent of consumers don't fill prescriptions due to cost concerns; 47 don't take drugs as prescribed; 38 percent said they stopped taking a medication early. Millennials in particular seemed worried about health care costs—the survey found that 61 percent of millennials did not go forward with a medical treatment because they were concerned about costs; only 31 percent of baby boomers said the same. |
Consumers, health professionals agree on some issues, disagree on others
Consumers and health executives disagree somewhat on the burden of rising drug costs. The survey found that 40 percent of consumers said a top priority for hospitals over the next few years should be medication cost increases. In contrast, hospital executives ranked medication costs last in priorities for the next few years. Transparency in health and billing data, however, was supported strongly by all respondents. The report said of 87 percent of all respondents agree there is a lack of transparency in the pricing of health care services. And 88 percent agree price transparency in health services and medications should be a priority for the next presidential administration. Read more: |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250