Oracle, Suing US Labor Dept., Accuses Agency Enforcer of 'Power Grab'
The complaint, filed by a team from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, raised a constitutional challenge to the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. The office in 2017 sued Oracle over alleged discriminatory hiring and compensation practices.
November 27, 2019 at 09:47 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Oracle America Inc. on Wednesday sued the U.S. Labor Department in Washington federal court, urging a judge to curtail the power of an agency enforcer to investigate and prosecute workplace bias claims as the technology company wages a long and bitter fight to thwart Obama-era allegations of workplace bias.
The complaint, filed by a team from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, raised a constitutional challenge to the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, or OFCCP, the component that investigates and can punish contractors found in violation of federal anti-discrimination protections. The compliance office in January 2017 sued Oracle for alleged pay bias, and that case is pending at the Labor Department.
"The OFCCP has subjected Oracle to administrative proceedings that are unauthorized and impermissible, in violation of the law, and separation of powers," Orrick lawyers Andrew Silverman and Robbie Manhas said in the complaint. The suit confronts the Labor Department's creation of "an administrative trial system wherein agency officials prosecute and adjudicate discrimination claims against government contractors and then award broad injunctive and compensatory relief if the agency finds violations."
A representative for the Labor Department was not immediately reached for comment Wednesday.
The Obama-era Labor Department accused Oracle of broad discrimination against female, African American and Asian employees. The case alleged compensation, recruiting and hiring discrimination. In an amended complaint, labor enforcers said the alleged bias cost women and minority workers $400 million in lost wages.
"Oracle's suppression of pay for its non-white, non-male employees is so extreme that it persists and gets worse over long careers," the Labor Department alleged. "Female, black and Asian employees with years of experience are paid as much as 25 percent less than their peers."
Oracle has denied the government's claims, asserting the company is "in compliance with our regulatory obligations, committed to equality and proud of our employees."
Adverse findings against government contractors could threaten current and future federal government contracts. Many cases against big companies settle, sometimes for millions of dollars. OFCCP said last month that fiscal year 2019 was "by far its most successful year in both enforcement and compliance assistance." The office said it had obtained a record $40.5 million in monetary settlements for affected class members.
"Through a combination of effective enforcement and proactive compliance assistance, OFCCP has made a major impact on ensuring equal employment opportunity for America's workforce, and will continue to do so in the upcoming year," Craig Leen, the director of OFCCP, said in a statement last month.
Oracle's suit said OFCCP in 1977 "radically departed from its previous understanding of its power. Without authority, the OFCCP transformed itself into a super-EEOC by giving itself power that exceeds what Congress granted to the EEOC." The complaint alleged a "power grab" remains in place today.
In its complaint, Oracle took steps to portray the company as broadly supportive of anti-discrimination laws. Other technology companies fighting claims of workplace bias have made similar assertions in court papers.
"Oracle recognizes that lawful, constitutional prosecution and adjudication of employment claims against employers, including government contractors, can play an important role in promoting equal employment and ending employment discrimination, in all forms," Oracle's lawyers said in their lawsuit. "Oracle opposes discrimination, which has no place in employment or anywhere else. The issue here is the place and manner in which claims of discrimination and affirmative-action violations are prosecuted and adjudicated. Those claims must be pursued fairly and constitutionally."
In 2017, a Trump administration proposal would have disbanded the Labor Department's contract compliance enforcer and merged it with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. That move, according to the Trump administration, would "reduce operational redundancies, promote efficiencies, improve services to citizens, and strengthen civil rights enforcement."
Oracle's complaint is posted below:
||
Read more:
Government Warns Law Firms of Consequences for Diversity Failures
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 2Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 3Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 42 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 5Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250