Australia's Great Barrier Reef Needs Insurance Against Climate Risks, Says Clyde & Co
The Great Barrier Reef is both a World Heritage site and an economic asset that provides jobs, income and government revenue. Therefore, it should be insured against catastrophic events to guarantee its longterm resilience, the report says.
December 05, 2019 at 04:11 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Australia's Great Barrier Reef is in such dire condition it should be insured for A$56 billion (US$38 billion) against climate risks and environmental damage, global law firm Clyde & Co says in a report.
The report, "Threats, challenges, and opportunities for the sustainable future of Australia's greatest environmental asset," states the Barrier Reef risks being overwhelmed by coral bleaching, sea level rises, ocean acidification, and pollution.
"Aside from being a World Heritage site, the Great Barrier Reef is an economic asset which provides jobs, income and government revenue," the report's author, Jacinta Studdert, a Sydney-based environment partner at Clyde & Co, said in a statement. "Like other economic assets, it should be insured against certain catastrophic events to guarantee its long-term resilience."
The report cites figures from Deloitte Access Economics valuing the Barrier Reef at A$56 billion (US$38 billion) and said it contributed A$6.4 billion (US$4.4 billion) and over 64,000 jobs to the Australian economy in 2015-2016.
The report also states government and businesses operating in and around the reef can be the target of public interest litigation to curtail particular activities. It said there is a long history of public interest litigation concerning the reef, given the number of relevant stakeholders and regulators, as well as high community expectations for its protection.
"As such, there are strong litigation risks for proponents of development or activities within the GBR Marine Park, or which are within the catchment area for the reef," the report states.
The 42 million-hectare Great Barrier Reef sits off the east coast of Australia and incorporates a World Heritage marine park that attracts more than 2.2 million international and 1.7 million domestic visitors per year.
The report says one option for managing the risk of physical harm to the reef, and consequential economic and other losses, is to establish a dedicated management trust fund and obtain parametric insurance coverage.
Parametric insurance provides coverage where a specific event occurs and differs from traditional types of insurance policies, as they involve an advance agreement between the insurer and insured that a specific payment will be made upon the occurrence of a specific event. When the insured event takes place, this triggers a fixed amount to be paid to the insured.
"Parametric insurance can therefore provide greater certainty of coverage and payments for weather-related risks can be made more quickly," the report states. "This can be crucial for governments and communities responding to natural disasters or environmental issues that may occur."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250