Australia's Great Barrier Reef Needs Insurance Against Climate Risks, Says Clyde & Co
The Great Barrier Reef is both a World Heritage site and an economic asset that provides jobs, income and government revenue. Therefore, it should be insured against catastrophic events to guarantee its long-term resilience, the report says.
December 05, 2019 at 04:11 PM
3 minute read
Australia's Great Barrier Reef is in such dire condition it should be insured for $38 billion against climate risks and environmental damage, global law firm Clyde & Co says in a report.
The report, "Threats, Challenges, and Opportunities for the Sustainable Future of Australia's Greatest Environmental asset," states that the Barrier Reef risks being overwhelmed by coral bleaching, sea-level rises, ocean acidification, and pollution.
"Aside from being a World Heritage site, the Great Barrier Reef is an economic asset that provides jobs, income and government revenue," the report's author, Jacinta Studdert, a Sydney-based environment partner at Clyde & Co, said in a statement. "Like other economic assets, it should be insured against certain catastrophic events to guarantee its long-term resilience."
The report cites figures from Deloitte Access Economics valuing the Barrier Reef at $38 billion and said it contributed $4.4 billion and more than 64,000 jobs to the Australian economy in 2015-16.
The report also states that government and businesses operating in and around the reef can be the target of public interest litigation to curtail particular activities. It said there is a long history of public interest litigation concerning the reef, given the number of relevant stakeholders and regulators, as well as high community expectations for its protection.
"As such, there are strong litigation risks for proponents of development or activities within the GBR Marine Park, or which are within the catchment area for the reef," the report states.
The 42 million-hectare Great Barrier Reef sits off the east coast of Australia and incorporates a World Heritage marine park that attracts more than 2.2 million international and 1.7 million domestic visitors per year.
The report says one option for managing the risk of physical harm to the reef, and consequential economic and other losses, is to establish a dedicated management trust fund and obtain parametric insurance coverage.
Parametric insurance provides coverage where a specific event occurs and differs from traditional types of insurance policies, as it involves an advance agreement between the insurer and insured that a specific payment will be made upon the occurrence of a specific event. When the insured event takes place, this triggers a fixed amount to be paid to the insured.
"Parametric insurance can therefore provide greater certainty of coverage and payments for weather-related risks can be made more quickly," the report states. "This can be crucial for governments and communities responding to natural disasters or environmental issues that may occur."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readHUD Charges Texas HOA With Housing Discrimination in Last Days of Biden Administration
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250