SoCal Prosecutor Patrick Bumatay Confirmed to Ninth Circuit Seat
Bumatay, whose nomination was opposed by California's Democratic senators, is the first openly gay appellate judge appointed by President Donald Trump and the first of Filipino descent.
December 10, 2019 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
|
The U.S. Senate has voted to confirm Southern California federal prosecutor Patrick Bumatay to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Confirmed in a 53-40 vote Tuesday, Bumatay becomes the first openly gay appellate judge appointed by President Donald Trump and the first of Filipino descent.
Bumatay also becomes the ninth Ninth Circuit judge appointed by the president to fill one of the court's 29 active judge seats. He's also the fourth judge confirmed to a seat based in California despite objections from the state's two Democratic U.S. senators.
As they did before with the nominations of Judges Kenneth Lee, Daniel Collins and Daniel Bress, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris declined to return so-called blue slips indicating their sign-off on Bumatay's nomination. Feinstein said at the Senate Judiciary hearing on Bumatay's nomination that she appreciated the diversity he would bring to the bench, but that she had concerns about his lack of appellate experience. Harris had previously cited Bumatay's lack of experience and "a troubling prosecutorial record" in announcing her opposition to the nomination.
Bumatay served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the appellate and narcotics sections of the Southern District of California in the run-up to his nomination. The president initially tapped him for the Ninth Circuit last year while he was serving as a counselor to then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions on criminal issues, including the opioid crisis and transnational organized crime. Early in his career, Bumatay clerked for Judge Timothy Tymkovich on the Tenth Circuit and U.S. District Judge Sandra L. Townes of the Eastern District of New York.
Also on Tuesday, the Senate voted 53-40 to end debate on the Ninth Circuit nomination of Lawrence VanDyke, setting the stage for a vote on his nomination as soon as Wednesday. VanDyke, the former solicitor general of Nevada and Montana, received a "not qualified" rating from judicial vetters at the American Bar Association and his nomination has faced vocal opposition from LBGTQ groups and gun control advocates. Prior to a party-line vote on VanDyke's nomination in the Senate Judiciary Committee last month, Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, noted that VanDyke and Bumatay shared the witness table at their confirmation hearing and that Bumatay said that he would be comfortable with VanDyke as a judge or a colleague.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmir Ali, MacArthur Justice Center Director, Confirmed to DC District Court
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
Attorneys Go to DC Federal Court Seeking Damages for Plaintiffs in Oct. 7, 2023, Attack on Israel
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 4Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250