How to Hit the 'No' Button (And Keep Your Law Job!)
Failing to set boundaries—and as a result not giving yourself enough time to rest, recharge and recover—can increase the risk of mental health problems.
December 18, 2019 at 01:28 PM
8 minute read
|
I have a large red button on my desk that reads, quite simply, "No!"
Push this said button—which is really more of a toy, inspired by the Staples "That was Easy" button—and you hear one of 10 different "No's," all of which make clear that you should really stop asking me for things. The button, a plastic novelty not well aligned with my general aesthetic, is also not well aligned with my general personality, and that's because when pushed, it clearly and easily sets boundaries.
Given to me five years ago by a colleague who thought I worked way too much, the button spent most of 2019 completely out of sight, buried under a constantly mutating but never shrinking stack of papers. The irony, I suppose, is plain. But now, as I look ahead to 2020, the lesson is also important and worth discussing.
Like many people, I struggle with maintaining good boundaries. Not the physical kind, the boundaries I struggle with are knowing when to say no to more work, when to stop working each day, when to take time off, and when to accept that my best was good enough. In short, they are the prototypical boundary issues of many—if not most—people working in and around the legal profession.
Even though I know better—academically, personally and clinically—the struggle to say no is real. My compass is and always has been oriented toward doing rather than dawdling, achieving rather than aspiring, succeeding rather than settling. As a result, if I am not vigilant, I can sometimes find myself both completely overworked and totally unable to appreciate and enjoy just how much I have already produced. In fact, that's a lose-lose that takes effort and determination to avoid.
This scenario may sound familiar: There is always more to do. The expectations of your constant availability are unabating and the pace of any given week feels wholly breakneck. You find yourself exhausted, while the recognition and satisfaction of what's already been accomplished quickly fade from view or fail to even register.
If this does in fact sound like you, you can at least take comfort in knowing that admitting a problem is often the hardest and most important step toward overcoming it. And make no mistake, over the long haul, a lack of boundaries around your work is most definitely a problem.
Yes, your employer may love you for it, but your body, mind, family, friends and joie de vivre will eventually beg to differ. In time, even your employer might come to realize that you've been flying too close to the sun, likely when your behavior or appearance start raising risk-management concerns.
I've written plenty of articles about the threats to mental health and personal well-being that exist in the legal profession, as well as the widespread nature of addiction and other behavioral health problems. No need to retread that ground here, but suffice it to say, there are occupational hazards aplenty. Failing to adopt and enforce boundaries—and as a result not giving yourself enough time to rest, recharge and recover—does nothing but increase your vulnerability to those hazards.
So, what to do if you want to make some improvements in this regard for 2020? I'll offer a handful of meaningful suggestions, with the caveat that I know from experience they're all easier said than done. I also know from experience that they're all perfectly doable.
First, start by acknowledging you have boundary issues. If you're still reading this column, chances are you've got that covered. Next, try to take that self-awareness to another, more constructive level. Taking a self-inventory is generally never a bad idea, but here it is crucial.
Start by reflecting on where and with whom your boundaries are the most porous, and what it is that's driving your unwillingness or inability to say no under various circumstances.
Are there specific clients, people in your firm, or other co-workers that you seem to always have a hard time saying no to, even when it causes problems or excessive and unreasonable stress for you? If so, why is that? [Sidebar: If you're thinking "um, hello, I have a hard time saying no because they're my boss or an important client," that's unfortunately not a good enough answer. Even bosses and important clients need to be told no on occasion, and if they can't be, maybe they're not a great boss or client.]
Are you making fear-based decisions, perhaps afraid of what will happen if you dare say no? If so, where is that fear coming from? Is your self-worth overly dependent on your work and achievements? Maybe you have people-pleasing tendencies? How's your self-esteem? What are your actual values in this life and are your decisions (because they are decisions) to always say yes supporting or undermining those values?
Finding answers to all these questions will not be easy and certainly won't always be comfortable, but in order to change your boundary-free ways, some greater level of self-insight is required. Understand where you're coming from, and it will be easier to direct where you are going.
Once you have a better handle on why your boundaries with work are less than ideal, start taking small, steady, measured steps to push back. Slowly begin to challenge your prevailing tendencies to say yes, or to always take on more work. Key words? Small, steady, slowly. Just as our boundaries tend to erode gradually over time, our efforts to reclaim them should also be incremental and consistent.
Why? Because if you are someone who always and reliably says yes to whatever is thrown your way, then you suddenly start always saying no, you will likely engender some serious frustration, disappointment and disapproval. People won't understand why you've abruptly become so seemingly difficult and uncommitted, and your relationships and career will suffer as a result. This is an easy mistake to avoid.
Instead, think of the proverbial frog in a pot, and begin to do the opposite. Lower the flame, slowly over time. Just as the frog doesn't jump out of the water because it is heating up too slowly for it to recognize its impending demise, those you work for and with will be less resistant to the reclamation of your humanity if you don't shock them with it all at once. Small boundary here, small boundary there, and before you know it, you've perhaps regained a semblance of manageability.
Finally, but equally important, be mindful of your language and communication style when attempting to set and enforce boundaries. First, don't be Captain Obvious. There is no need to say, "I'm sorry, I can't get that to you by Monday—I'm setting a boundary." No likable person talks like that, and you might still want people to like you, even if you are telling them no.
Second, don't over-explain. Yes, it may be important to offer some general context for your inability to accommodate a request, but keep it simple. The more complex or convoluted your explanation, the more it will seem like you are making a litany of excuses instead of communicating a reasonable boundary.
Third, don't be annoyingly apologetic. You are working with professionals, they don't need, want or respect saccharine regret. You didn't spill hot coffee on them or forget to feed their cat while they were exploring India for three weeks. You are expressing a reasonable limit to your ability or willingness to do something and being overly apologetic about it undercuts the strength of and respect for your position.
As you look ahead to 2020, start thinking and planning now about how you might begin setting better boundaries around your work. If you don't, the default pace of your life could easily sweep you away for another year, and your own personal "No" button will just get lost in the shuffle along the way.
Patrick Krill is the founder of Krill Strategies, a behavioral health consulting firm focused exclusively on the legal industry. Go to www.prkrill.com for more information. He is also a member of Law.com's Minds Over Matters advisory board.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250