Alston & Bird Hit With $4.7M Verdict in Legal Malpractice Case
The law firm attempted to shift blame to an accounting firm, which was not a defendant at trial.
December 19, 2019 at 08:24 AM
5 minute read
A jury has found Alston & Bird liable for $4.7 million after determining that the law firm's erroneous tax advice to a longtime client and subsequent cover-up of the error constituted legal malpractice.
The jury in Fulton County, Ga., issued the Dec. 13 verdict for MSouth Equity Partners after deliberating about seven hours following a two-week trial, said David Pernini, a partner at Atlanta's Wargo French. French was part of the team that represented MSouth Equity Partners and nearly a dozen other minority shareholders.
Pernini said that, despite Alston & Bird's efforts to shift blame to an outside accounting firm for the bad tax advice and resulting multimillion-dollar tax liability, the jury found the law firm 100% liable. That accounting firm was not a defendant in the trial.
Alston & Bird made the initial error in 2011, Pernini said. But in 2013, when the error and the potential tax liability was discovered by an outside accounting firm, Alston & Bird doubled down, sticking to its original advice.
"They at all times contended they did not make an error, in 2011, 2013 and 2014," Pernini said. "This lawsuit was about trying to make our clients whole."
The jury awarded nearly $4.7 million in compensatory damages to MSouth, finding that Alston & Bird twice engaged in legal malpractice, according to the verdict form.
The jury also awarded an additional $69,897 to MSouth that Alston & Bird billed the partnership after finding the law firm was unjustly enriched as a result of its bad advice, according to Pernini and the verdict form. The jury made no award to the minority partners, finding the law firm had no fiduciary duty to them.
MSouth's partners include three former ranking executives of Bellsouth Corp.: Barry L. Boniface, Bellsouth's former chief strategy and development officer who also served as a managing director at Barclays Capital and Lehman Brothers; Charles Stubbs, former president of BellSouth Intelliventure and former CEO of Yellowpages.com; and Mark Feidler, Bellsouth's former president and COO and former COO of Cingular Wireless.
In addition to Pernini, the Wargo French team representing MSouth included partners Vernon Strickland and Michael French, of counsel Heather Fugitt and associate Kathleen Hicks.
King & Spalding partner Robert Thornton, who joined with partner David Balser to defend Alston & Bird, declined comment.
Alston & Bird's general counsel and spokespeople could not be reached for comment.
Fulton County Senior Superior Court Judge Elizabeth Long presided over the trial.
MSouth Equity Partners sued Alston & Bird in 2017 to claw back more than $7.6 million in federal and state taxes and interest the investment firm said it was belatedly forced to pay to the IRS. The tax bill surfaced following a 2011 investment deal involving another Alston client in which MSouth held a majority interest, the malpractice complaint said.
MSouth claimed that Alston & Bird lawyers made the initial $15 million error after advising LMS Intellibound Group that its 2011 merger with another investment firm would not be viewed skeptically by the IRS as a way of avoiding taxes. As majority owner of LMS, MSouth's tax liability was an estimated $7.6 million, according to the complaint.
As part of the sale, "Our client provided a special indemnity in this instance to cover potential fallout from an IRS audit at the same time it was receiving assurances from Alston & Bird" that even though it was having to put money in escrow, at the end of the day it would emerge from the audit unscathed, Pernini said.
He said MSouth asked the jury to award the full $7.6 million in tax payments, interest and penalties, but Alston & Bird lawyers contended that amount should be offset by other future tax benefits they claimed MSouth will eventually realize as a result of Alston's settlement of the tax audit that resulted in the original liability finding.
According to the complaint, LMS' merger and a subsequent $60 million cash distribution to LMS shareholders, including MSouth, led to the tax liability. Alston attorneys advised both LMS and MSouth that the legal structure of the deal would prevent it from being considered a "disguised sale" intended to hide taxable earnings from the merger.
When LMS accountants uncovered the error in 2013, Alston & Bird generated an email, memorandum and side letter containing a "post-hac rationalization of the 2011 tax advice that mischaracterized the deal documents," according to court records reflecting MSouth's contentions.
By 2014, while advising MSouth on the 2014 merger, Alston & Bird was simultaneously following the advice of the firm's general counsel and put its malpractice insurance carrier on notice of a possible claim, according to court records. However, the firm never informed MSouth or LMS of the adverse tax issue or of its possible conflict of interest arising from its original, and erroneous advice, MSouth lawyers contended.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
4 minute readConsumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 2Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 3State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 4Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 5Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250