Gibson Dunn, DoorDash's Ties to New Mass Arbitration Protocol Can Be Explored, Judge Says
U.S. District Judge William Alsup also ordered the CEO of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution to sit for a deposition by lawyers representing DoorDash couriers, but denied the lawyers' request for communications the alternative dispute resolution company had with other companies.
December 20, 2019 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge has ordered the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution, or CPR, to hand over documents involving input from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and DoorDash on a new process for handling mass arbitrations in employment cases.
At a hearing Friday, U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California also ordered CPR president and CEO Allen Waxman to sit for a deposition by lawyers at Keller Lenkner, who represent thousands of DoorDash couriers seeking to pursue employee misclassification claims against the company before a separate arbitration provider.
Alsup, however, stopped short of granting the Keller Lenker lawyers access to all the documents they were seeking, including communications and financial information about others who gave input into the development of CPR's new "Employment-Related Mass-Claims Protocol," which launched in November. Alsup told Keller Lenkner's Warren Postman that it was "beyond the pale" to ask for nearly 30 categories of documents from CPR, a third party in the dispute between couriers and DoorDash. Alsup said the request was the equivalent of asking CPR's lawyers to "stand on their head and stack greased BBs."
The hearing comes as the Keller Lenkner lawyers accuse DoorDash and Gibson Dunn of attempting to short-circuit thousands of arbitrations its delivery workers pursued before the American Arbitration Association, or AAA. Keller Lenkner filed suit in November seeking to compel arbitration on behalf of 2,236 delivery workers, called Dashers, who had previously filed demands before AAA in August to arbitrate claims that the company misclassified them as contractors rather than employees. The firm claims that even though AAA found the plaintiffs met its requirements to proceed with arbitration, DoorDash declined to pay its portion of the arbitration fees—$1,900 per claimant.
The Keller Lenkner lawyers claim that the day after AAA administratively closed the pending arbitrations due to DoorDash's failure to pay, the company began pushing out a new arbitration agreement incorporating CPR's recently developed mass claims protocol, which includes a procedure to randomly choose 10 bellwether cases in matters where many individual employees bring the same sorts of claims against a company. The Keller Lenkner lawyers claim it could take years to resolve their clients' cases under the new protocol.
In court papers filed Thursday, Gibson Dunn denied it helped CPR draft the new mass arbitration rules, but did confirm that lawyers at the firm and DoorDash had conversations with CPR as the protocol was in development. The firm, which did not send a representative to Friday's discovery hearing before Alsup, denied there was anything "nefarious" about the six substantive phone calls it had with CPR representatives prior to the new protocols' launch.
Alsup on Friday praised CPR and its counsel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius lawyer Kimberley Lunetta, for being "eminently reasonable" in being willing to share communications with Gibson Dunn and DoorDash. Lunetta said that her client's hope was that its "reputation as a neutral is not sullied in this process."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250