Photo: iStockCatholic Deacon and One-Time Attorney Suspended After Pleading Guilty to Solicitation of Children
A Catholic deacon and one-time attorney from Allegheny County has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law after pleading guilty to soliciting lewd images from a police officer posing as a teenage boy online.
December 30, 2019 at 12:59 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
A Catholic deacon and one-time attorney from Allegheny County has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law after pleading guilty to soliciting lewd images from a police officer posing as a teenage boy online.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court suspended Rosendo F. Dacal, 75, effective Jan. 29. Dacal pleaded guilty to charges of criminal solicitation of sexual abuse of children and criminal use of communication facility in Washington County last year.
The court's order read: "And now, this 30th day of December, 2019, having received no response to a rule to show cause why Rosendo F. Dacal should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and he is placed on temporary suspension. See Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(2). He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217."
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Debra Todd did not participate in the decision.
Dacal was arrested after soliciting lewd images from an officer posing as a 14-year-old boy. He was sentenced to community service and was ordered by a Washington County judge to register as a sex offender, according to media reports. Dacal has been suspended by the church.
"Mr. Dacal was improperly communicating with a police officer posing as a teenager, and by his plea of guilty, he has accepted criminal responsibility for that transgression," Dacal's attorney, Robert Del Greco, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in October 2018.
The year in which Dacal was convicted was a landmark year for revelations of clergy sex-abuse, with the release of the Pennsylvania Attorney General's bombshell grand jury report.
The report, which was released in August 2018, exposed seven decades of abuse by clergy members, and said more than 1,000 children had been sexually abused in the state. The release sparked a national debate about accountability for child sexual abuse, and led several states and the U.S. Department of Justice to launch similar investigations.
Release of the report had initially been blocked over due process concerns, since those named in the report would be publicly seen as child abusers even though the report's accusations would never be properly adjudicated in court.
In July 2018, the Supreme Court allowed the report to be released publicly, but ordered that the names of those with due process challenges needed to be redacted—at least temporarily. The court's 31-page opinion announcing its decisions had said that, although the report could be released with the names of specific priests and church officials redacted, those challenging the report's release raised significant constitutional due process issues that the court needed to address.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read
New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
