Litchfield Cavo Plots Growth Amid First Leadership Change
"It's very large shoes to fill," said John Jarosak, who compared his succession of Alan Becker as managing partner to an NCAA basketball dynasty.
December 30, 2019 at 01:49 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Chicago-based litigation defense firm Litchfield Cavo will get its second-ever managing partner since the firm's 1998 founding when Lynnfield, Massachusetts, partner John Jarosak takes over for Alan Becker on Wednesday, at the start of the new year.
Taking the reins of the firm from Becker is not unlike taking over an NCAA basketball dynasty, Jarosak said. He specifically compared his succession of Becker to Gene Bartow's succession of John Wooden at UCLA—Wooden led the men's basketball team to 10 NCAA championships in 12 years; Bartow became the coach after Wooden retired in 1975.
"It's very large shoes to fill," Jarosak said. "Al has guided the firm as its managing partner since its inception. We have grown in a measured and very positive sense since I've been with the firm, which is [in] 2002. At that time, we had four offices and around 38 attorneys in total."
Litchfield Cavo now has 275 lawyers spread across 22 offices and Becker was "instrumental in guiding the firm through that growth period," Jarosak said.
Jarosak is hoping the firm will grow under his watch as well. He said he anticipates Litchfield Cavo will grow to 300 lawyers within the next three to five years by adding people to new practice areas. Litchfield Cavo has largely focused on representing insurance companies. Earlier this year, the firm successfully represented an insurer who limited the amount of money a Naples, Florida, golf course could recover from Hurricane Irma.
"We have started to expand out to other areas of practice," Jarosak said. "I expect that trend to continue, [as] we diversify the nature of the practices here at Litchfield Cavo over the next three to five years."
Jarosak also said he is optimistic that the firm, under his leadership, will "increase our footprint across the country," although he demurred when asked if Litchfield Cavo is planning to open new offices.
"We're constantly in discussions with either potential [lateral] partners or sometimes small groups of partners and associates who are in locations that we currently do not have an office," Jarosak said. "There is nothing currently today that is imminent, but as I mentioned, we're always looking."
The last half of 2019 saw a number of merger and combination announcements from Litchfield Cavo's Midwest competitors, including Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister, which announced a deal with Minneapolis-based Briggs & Morgan, and Minneapolis-based Faegre Baker Daniels, which is planning a merger with Philadelphia-based Drinker Biddle & Reath.
Jarosak said Litchfield Cavo is under no pressure to scale up. "We prefer to do it within, so to speak, and grow the firm as it is," he said. "I don't anticipate any type of large-scale merger with another law firm."
2019 saw a couple of high-profile departures from Litchfield Cavo. In January, two partners in Pennsylvania jumped ship to Freeman Mathis, allowing it to open an office in Pittsburgh. In June, more than half of Litchfield Cavo's Houston office left to start its own litigation boutique—McKinney Taylor. Principal Andrew McKinney told Texas Lawyer client conflicts were becoming an issue at Litchfield Cavo, and they were worried about the financial costs created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Asked about their departures, Jarosak echoed a point made by McKinney earlier this year, that the former Litchfield Cavo lawyers wanted to create their own Texas-centric law firm.
"We respected their decision and we had a very professional and amicable departing," Jarosak said.
|Read More
Law Firm Expansion in Texas Continued at Strong Clip in 2019
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 2Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 3FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
- 4'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
- 5Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250